RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Ksandre Katrius on Wed Sep 30 1998 04:20 pm

It's practically useless, it's so bad (actually, it is XENIX clone).
It'd be fun to have a LINUX one!

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made the .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing the BAJA....
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Reaper Man on Wed Oct 21 1998 11:48 am

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made the .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing the BAJA....

this is like the sdos shell right?
also would it use unix type syntax also?

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Beta on Thu Oct 22 1998 10:00 am

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made th .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing t BAJA....

this is like the sdos shell right?
also would it use unix type syntax also?

Yes like the DOS shell, and it's up tho whom ever codes the dang thing all I did was make .asc's not the code.....
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Reaper Man on Wed Oct 21 1998 11:48 am

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Ksandre Katrius on Wed Sep 30 1998 04:20 pm

It's practically useless, it's so bad (actually, it is XENIX clone). It'd be fun to have a LINUX one!

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made the .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing the BAJA....
Beta

Hmm, can I have the ASC's Beta?
I think I will do it. I just hate makeing ASCiis.
Hkb

---
■ Synchronet ■ Explorer - explorer.detour.net 7:00-8:00pm

RE: Baja
BY: Hkb to Beta on Thu Oct 22 1998 03:59 pm

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made th .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing t

Hmm, can I have the ASC's Beta?
I think I will do it. I just hate makeing ASCiis.

Their in you mail box....
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Reaper Man on Thu Oct 22 1998 15:39:00

Yes like the DOS shell, and it's up tho whom ever codes the dang thing all I did was make .asc's not the code.....

The *.SRC is included in that "BNIX*" (XENIX Shell for SBBS) file.
Maybe that's a start. There's some invalid BAJA codes in there though (not fit for the latest BAJA). As I said, I fixed most of it, but it stills fails on some commands.

---
■ Synchronet ■ BajaHaus at MEKHET's IFHU TOWER_OF_DESTINY_BBS 603-293-0580

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Beta on Fri Oct 23 1998 08:50 am

Yes like the DOS shell, and it's up tho whom ever codes the dang thing al did was make .asc's not the code.....

The *.SRC is included in that "BNIX*" (XENIX Shell for SBBS) file.
Maybe that's a start. There's some invalid BAJA codes in there though (not for the latest BAJA). As I said, I fixed most of it, but it stills fails on some commands.

Okay okay, I'll have a look for it and see what I can do.... Gesh... More BAJAing....
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Ksandre Katrius on Sat Oct 24 1998 10:47 pm

Yes like the DOS shell, and it's up tho whom ever codes the dang thing did was make .asc's not the code.....

The *.SRC is included in that "BNIX*" (XENIX Shell for SBBS) file.
Maybe that's a start. There's some invalid BAJA codes in there though (n for the latest BAJA). As I said, I fixed most of it, but it stills fails some commands.

Okay okay, I'll have a look for it and see what I can do.... Gesh... More BAJAing....

Oh yah, and I don't even have the BBS on my HD so this will be dificult.... Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

This is the Baja Programming sub. Keep your programming nonsense in programming please. If you want to post code here then write it in Baja.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Reaper Man on Tue Oct 27 1998 17:12:00

This is the Baja Programming sub. Keep your programming nonsense in programm please. If you want to post code here then write it in Baja.

oops, i kinda forgot about the programming sub, we never put enough enphasis on it... for all you sysops, just move the 4 messages to the programming subs and accept my admition of being careless...

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Reaper Man on Tue Oct 27 1998 05:12 pm

This is the Baja Programming sub. Keep your programming nonsense in programm please. If you want to post code here then write it in Baja.

Okay.....
print "/1h/1rCool idea but I think it'll make it harder to write messages/n" yes_no "I'm correct right?"
if_true
exec_bin realhard
else
exec_bin notbad
end_if
print "/1h/1rBeta"

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Tommyknocker on Tue Oct 27 1998 08:43 pm

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Reaper Man on Tue Oct 27 1998 17:12:00

This is the Baja Programming sub. Keep your programming nonsense in progr please. If you want to post code here then write it in Baja.

oops, i kinda forgot about the programming sub, we never put enough enphasis it... for all you sysops, just move the 4 messages to the programming subs accept my admition of being careless...

print "You forgot to write in BAJA.... heheheehe LOL"
print "/1h/1rBeta"

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Reaper Man on Wed Oct 28 1998 15:43:00

print "You forgot to write in BAJA.... heheheehe LOL"
print "/1h/1rBeta"

!include obnoxious_sysop.inc
!include way_cool_bbs_software.inc

!global currentlang$ = "BAJA"

print "sorry, need more practice at"; currentlang$
yes_no "accept my appology?"
if_true
print "thanks, your cool"
else
print " kiss mine!!!"
end_if
print "programs done, you can go on with your life now"



---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

!include anoyingposters.inc
yes_no "Is this getting REALLY anoying???"
if_true print "Thank You!"
if_false print " SHUT UP ANYWAYS!!"


---
■ Synchronet ■ Explorer - explorer.detour.net 7:00-8:00pm

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Reaper Man on Fri Sep 25 1998 11:04:00

Actually this is a good Idea. At 1 point I had almost 1500 lines of code. I started trimming and moving things around to work more efficiently and managed to cut back to 1000 line. Of course I am a rookie, so I do things t hard way. Then find my self backtracking to make things better.

the important part is not to discribe every single routine, but to start with a general skeleton that has the basic functions and add more to it as it goes along. Then, since you not trying to focus on as large an area, you'll get a better understanding of how the whole thing will work together.

perhaps I'll make my own language up so that I can document the programs

I can just see you sitting at a bus stop talking to yourself in your own language. The picture is priceless.

well, i was thinking mostly of a writen language, but translated to english when spoken.

hmm, well Im guess ing that you'll be up to your eyeballs in code for th couple days then...

I have over 75 hours involved in this so far. And I did not draw the Ansi.

hmm, when I went to do the dyndoom qb to baja I was figuring that I was gonna take all the complex screens and combine them into a data file (similar to
a wad file) and then just grab chunks of the file and send it to the screen to make up the image...

Also I am sure that it will be difficult for me to accually take the time to write the flowchart and document my ideas, but I guess if I want quality then I will need to spend a little extra time on it...



---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Aragorn on Fri Sep 25 1998 11:08:00

Well I have written 1004 lines of Baja code since Sunday Morning

Wow! What does it do?!

Well it is for listing Internet resources.
It has functions to add to telnet, web, ftp, and email address listings, as well as read them back to the user. I am working on releaseing version 1 an moving on to adding in all the search, edit, and delete functions. Last wil sysop functions.
Basically is is lind of a bbs list only for the internet.

well I made a script for mIRC that would store info for a ftp site and allow the person to update the entry at needed. they sent all the info for the site
<ip> <login> <pw> <port>
and then the script stores all this information into a .ini file along with the persons address and nick. The code was only 2kb but it took 2 days to write and debug...



---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Reaper Man on Fri Sep 25 1998 11:04 am

I have over 75 hours involved in this so far. And I did not draw the Ansi.

I only spent a hour on mine it is much smaller though... But I am working on a new one :)
Hkb

---
■ Synchronet ■ Explorer BBS - Vancouver, Washington - Number Comming Soon

Okey doke, I've got a couple interesting ones for ppl. a) how can I get a printfile to use a variable instead of typing it in Eg. printfile "c:\\sbbs\\test.txt"
Also, for the same reason, how do i get a variable into a fopen???? Eg. fopen test o_rdwr "c:\\sbbs\\test.dat" I need to replace the stuff between the " " on both with a variable, any Idea how guys?
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ A NEW weapon against The Borg...Make them D/L Windows!

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to All on Sat Jan 09 1999 12:56 pm

Okey doke, I've got a couple interesting ones for ppl. a) how can I get a printfile to use a variable instead of typing it in Eg. printfile "c:\\sbbs\\test.txt"
Also, for the same reason, how do i get a variable into a fopen???? Eg. fop test o_rdwr "c:\\sbbs\\test.dat" I need to replace the stuff between the "

First a couple of pointers. Type your qustions and the code you are discussing seperately. You should enter the code just exactally as you are trying ot use it.
Also, if you are writing a mod just for your bbs then using a full path is ok, but using a global path and directory will work on any standard Sync system regardless of drive letters.


##### define string variable for later use #####

str testdata

##### open the file on the hard drive. Create it if it does not exist.
###### %j starts us out in the sbbs\data directory #####fopen file1

o_creat|o_rdwr|o_denynone "%jbajamods\\????\\test.dat"


##### now that the file is open you need to read your data from it #####
##### the ?? being the length of the data in question. ####

fread file1 testdata ??



Now if you use print testdata, whatever was in the file is printed. Not knowing what you are doing it is difficult narrowing this down any more.
Also, I know very little Baja, so I am sure there are many versions to this same task.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░





---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Beta on Sat Jan 09 1999 01:01 pm

Also, if you are writing a mod just for your bbs then using a full path ok, but using a global path and directory will work on any standard Sync sys regardless of drive letters.

I'm trying to make it so the directory dosn't have to be dynamic amoung all BBS's, so that the SysOp can specify where the proggy is. UCD sujested a few things, but I'm not 100% sure how to do it... :) LOL.
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ A NEW weapon against The Borg...Make them D/L Windows!

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Tommyknocker on Sun Jan 10 1999 02:15 am

I'm trying to make it so the directory dosn't have to be dynamic amoung all BBS's, so that the SysOp can specify where the proggy is. UCD sujested a fe

That was my point. Make it simple for everyone and you will be alot happier in the end.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja problem
BY: Tommyknocker to Spiritwild on Fri Jan 15 1999 06:27 pm

RE: Baja problem
BY: Spiritwild to TOMMYKNOCKER on Thu Jan 14 1999 08:58 pm

end_switch

True :) but doesn't the end_case prevent it from falling through ?
Like it matters, your gonna get tossed out via "hangup" <G>

Well as I understand it end_case does indeed end that particular case, b it will look for another switch until it finds end_switch.
Of course I could be wrong.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░

I am pretty sure TK is right..



---
■ Synchronet ■ |03<<<|12Explorer BBS|03>>> - Vancouver, Wa - 360-574-5521

Is there a way to check for a cd in the drive through
baja ? What I have is a proggie I wrote to display a screen
telling which cd is in the drive. Everything works to my
satisfaction, but if there is no cd I get the
error reading drive [A]bort,etc....

Just need to know if there is a function I
can use. Like Synchronet uses [FILE NOT ONLINE]


---
■ Synchronet ■ SPIRIT OF THE WILD BBS

RE: Baja
BY: Spiritwild to All on Sun Feb 07 1999 01:17 pm

Is there a way to check for a cd in the drive through
baja ? What I have is a proggie I wrote to display a screen
telling which cd is in the drive. Everything works to my
satisfaction, but if there is no cd I get the
error reading drive [A]bort,etc....

Just need to know if there is a function I
can use. Like Synchronet uses [FILE NOT ONLINE]

USE EZ-ROM!!!!
I use it and it rocks...



---
■ Synchronet ■ Explorer BBS - e-mail Hkb@hotbot.com or hkb@explorer for access

RE: Baja
BY: Spiritwild to All on Sun Feb 07 1999 01:17 pm

Is there a way to check for a cd in the drive through
baja ? What I have is a proggie I wrote to display a screen
telling which cd is in the drive. Everything works to my
satisfaction, but if there is no cd I get the
error reading drive [A]bort,etc....

Just need to know if there is a function I
can use. Like Synchronet uses [FILE NOT ONLINE]

USE EZ-ROM!!!!
I use it and it rocks...

I'm sure it does.... but it would be a waste of time for me.
I only have 2 cd's, synch is fine for that.
That and I edited the hell out of the text.dat file so
the file descriptions would look a bit more pleasant than
the puke default green. Great software but straight up
ugly in the beginning :)
---
■ SLMR 2.1a ■ Just shut-up!
■ Synchronet ■ SPIRIT OF THE WILD BBS

RE: Baja
BY: Spiritwild to HKB on Mon Feb 08 1999 05:17 pm

USE EZ-ROM!!!!

I'm sure it does.... but it would be a waste of time for me.
I only have 2 cd's, synch is fine for that.

Well Ezrom, has a scan feature. It will figure out what disks are in on the fly. If no disks are in a drive it will simply list them as offline but still let the user view the lists and request files if you have that turned on.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Spiritwild to HKB on Mon Feb 08 1999 05:17 pm

USE EZ-ROM!!!!

I'm sure it does.... but it would be a waste of time for me.
I only have 2 cd's, synch is fine for that.

Well Ezrom, has a scan feature. It will figure out what disks are in on
the fly. If no disks are in a drive it will simply list them as offline but TO>still let the user view the lists and request files if you have that turned
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░

Thanks, I get by, long as I keep a cd in the drive I'll be cheesey :)
I have a baja addon for the request part, I edited the .dat file
to read "file not online, try the request door" That works ok for me.
I may look for the helluv it.
---
■ SLMR 2.1a ■ www.geocities.com/southbeach/breakers/5862
■ Synchronet ■ SPIRIT OF THE WILD BBS

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Reaper Man on Thu Oct 01 1998 04:27 pm

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

Yes. It's called "BNIX1A.ZIP" and it won't compile with the new BAJA versio However, I diddled with it and fixed that, but there are still problems with some of the features in it. TK should have both the original and my version the TALAMASCA. (Although one of the versions I sent him is not the correct, most up2date one and I don't know which one he has now.)

It's really a ZENIX clone.

Hey, im the orig-on-all auther of bnix... i'm curios to know if anybodey out there is using it?...

I made it a ZENIX clone because thats the only unix-style system who's boot sequence was easy to emulate in a baja command shell, all emulated screens are taken directly from ZENIX. I found that most poeple found it a bit difficult to use, but i think i included some doctumentation.,

What is the name of the file you updated? id like to take a lookse, If anybodey is interested in it, i'll make a new version for 2.3, leme know!

/-\TiN MaN/-\


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Reaper Man on Thu Oct 01 1998 04:27 pm

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

Yes. It's called "BNIX1A.ZIP" and it won't compile with the new BAJA ver However, I diddled with it and fixed that, but there are still problems w some of the features in it. TK should have both the original and my vers the TALAMASCA. (Although one of the versions I sent him is not the corre most up2date one and I don't know which one he has now.)

It's really a ZENIX clone.

Hey, im the orig-on-all auther of bnix... i'm curios to know if anybodey out TI>there is using it?...

I have it but it's no longer online as menu.
cuz, most people can't even use the sync default commands.
All the boards around here are Wildcat.

I took most if not all of the main commands and put them in a
message menu. Just to simplify the main menu a bit.
D=doors
F=files
Q= qwk
etc,

To be honest, the original synch default screen still frightens me.
It was like brain damaging to new users <G>
---
■ SLMR 2.1a ■ Just shut-up!
■ Synchronet ■ SPIRIT OF THE WILD BBS

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Ksandre Katrius on Fri Apr 09 1999 03:01 am

What is the name of the file you updated? id like to take a lookse, If anybo is interested in it, i'll make a new version for 2.3, leme know!

Yes pls!
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ Gota see the Millennium Edition MX/Z by Ski-Doo!

RE: Baja
BY: Spiritwild to TINMAN on Fri Apr 09 1999 05:56 pm

To be honest, the original synch default screen still frightens me.
It was like brain damaging to new users <G>

When i was first starting out with bbs's, it was a MAJOR acomplishment for me to master the magical wounderment of 'the zmodem

;-)


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Tinman on Fri Apr 09 1999 12:22 pm

Yes pls!
Beta

Talk-a-tiv huh?, -nuf said... GET READY FOR B-NiX 2000 COMMING SOON ! ;-)

/-\TiN MaN/-\

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Spiritwild on Fri Apr 09 1999 23:15:00

When i was first starting out with bbs's, it was a MAJOR acomplishment for to master the magical wounderment of 'the zmodem

oh yea?
I mastered zmodem when the largest disk I had was 360kb (if I was running in 128 mode)

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Fri Apr 09 1999 23:17:00

Talk-a-tiv huh?, -nuf said... GET READY FOR B-NiX 2000 COMMING SOON ! ;-)

You know what would be much better?
A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

---
■ Synchronet ■ BajaHaus at MEKHET's IFHU TOWER_OF_DESTINY_BBS 603-293-0580

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Tinman on Sat Apr 10 1999 04:58 pm

Talk-a-tiv huh?, -nuf said... GET READY FOR B-NiX 2000 COMMING SOON ! ;-

A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

As I have started before, if you make a nice set of ansi or ascii menus for a Linux shell, I will write the code to match. Be a piece of cake.
░░▒▒▓▓╤ømmµKnøÇkεr▓▓▒▒░░


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Tinman on Sat Apr 10 1999 04:58 pm

You know what would be much better?
A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

There _used_ to be a UNIX shell. There originally was a DOS shell that someone brought out. Then an old-timer on DOVE-Net (name of Horsepwr if I remember correctly) took the DOS shell as a challenge and produced a UNIX shell. At the time I didn't know one end of UNIX from the other so I never tried it out.

Hmmm...


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Ksandre Katrius on Wed Apr 14 1999 06:16 pm

Talk-a-tiv huh?, -nuf said... GET READY FOR B-NiX 2000 COMMING SOON !

A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

As I have started before, if you make a nice set of ansi or ascii menus for Linux shell, I will write the code to match. Be a piece of cake.

Errr....

The thing about a UNIX sell is that there _are_ no menus. ANSI, ASCII or otherwise. The UNIX command shell looked like this:


$


unless you logged on as SysOp, in which case it looked like this:


#


Of course, a UNIX command-shell wouldn't be authentic unless someone wrote a 'vi' editor to use in place of SyncEdit. Which isn't such a crazy idea, after all, since 'vi' was designed to run over a serial connection, and since there must be at least a thousand open-source implementations if 'vi' out there. But I guess some ninny would demand a port of 'emacs' too....

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Ksandre Katrius to Tinman on Sat Apr 10 1999 04:58 pm

You know what would be much better?
A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

Yeah, ok, how bout we make a deal, ill do the kernal, and you make the Synchronet Linux Xwindows Baja menu set.

;-)

/-\TiN MaN/-\


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Angus Netfoot to Tommyknocker on Wed Apr 14 1999 08:48 pm

Of course, a UNIX command-shell wouldn't be authentic unless someone wrote a 'vi' editor to use in place of SyncEdit. Which isn't such a crazy idea, aft all, since 'vi' was designed to run over a serial connection, and since ther must be at least a thousand open-source implementations if 'vi' out there. I guess some ninny would demand a port of 'emacs' too....

Im already working on a baja linux menu set, and my simulated editor is almost half complete, look for it in about a week.

/-\TiN MaN/-\


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

Angus Netfoot wrote to Tommyknocker <=-

Of course, a UNIX command-shell wouldn't be authentic unless someone wrote a 'vi' editor to use in place of SyncEdit. Which isn't such a crazy idea, after all, since 'vi' was designed to run over a serial connection, and since there must be at least a thousand open-source implementations if 'vi' out there. But I guess some ninny would demand a port of 'emacs' too....

pico might not be so bad a choice, either, and might be a little easier
for those who are curious, but have little to no *nix experience. I
know *I* still avoid vi if at all possible. As to emacs, I only have
this to say. "Get thee behind me, foul demon!" I believe that emacs
lends creedence to the belief that Richard Stallman is, in fact, a stark
raving loony.


Scott Jones
(scottjones@hempseed.com)

... "42? 7 and a half million years and all you can come up with is 42?!"
--- MultiMail/OS/2 v0.25
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Fri Apr 09 1999 11:17 pm

Talk-a-tiv huh?

I could do a Rob Swindel impresion... :) LOL
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ Gota see the Millennium Edition MX/Z by Ski-Doo!

RE: Baja
BY: Tommyknocker to Ksandre Katrius on Wed Apr 14 1999 06:16 pm

Talk-a-tiv huh?, -nuf said... GET READY FOR B-NiX 2000 COMMING SOON !

A LINUX/Slackware Shell instead...<ahem>

As I have started before, if you make a nice set of ansi or ascii menus for Linux shell, I will write the code to match. Be a piece of cake.

I've already partitaly made a set a ASCII menu's for it, they need a few cosmetic touches to make it look better (It's just like a linux ls command) but the basis is there.
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ Gota see the Millennium Edition MX/Z by Ski-Doo!

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Tinman on Sat Apr 10 1999 07:59 pm

I could do a Rob Swindel impresion... :) LOL
Beta

LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

God, thats funny,. hehe. when i first started out with SBBS (i think it was version 1.0) if im not mistak-in,. i used to call him every five minutes and ask another question,. "duh, how do i get the cool colours man?" "duh, how do i ad files to my bbs without calling it from another line?" "DUH HOW DOW I, DUHHH HOW DO I???"

god, i musta called him 80 million times, befor long i was just say-in "hi, its me again, anyway, how do i ....." ;-)

but i must say, thru the hole thing he always kept qwite a profesional attitude...

/-\TiN MaN/-\

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Tommyknocker on Thu Apr 15 1999 18:38:00

I've already partitaly made a set a ASCII menu's for it, they need a few cosmetic touches to make it look better (It's just like a linux ls command) the basis is there.

hmm, you want a linux ls command???

bin mail public_html unix
c p tmp

ls -lsa is

total 99
1 drwx--x--x 8 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 17 14:02 .
23 drwxr-xr-x 1384 root root 22528 Apr 15 15:54 ..
4 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 3768 Sep 28 2018 .Xdefaults
0 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 0 Jan 19 10:43 .addressbook
3 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 2285 Mar 29 09:13 .addressbook.lu
9 -rw-r--r-- 1 tbrizend students 8582 Apr 18 23:20 .bash_history
1 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 24 Sep 28 2018 .bash_logout
1 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 680 Apr 8 08:18 .bash_profile
1 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 124 Sep 28 2018 .bashrc
1 -rw-r--r-- 1 tbrizend students 10 Mar 5 18:46 .newsrc
8 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 7273 Apr 17 14:02 .pine-debug1
8 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 7333 Apr 9 11:04 .pine-debug2
8 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 7418 Apr 6 16:42 .pine-debug3
8 -rw------- 1 tbrizend students 7233 Mar 30 11:14 .pine-debug4
12 -rw-r--r-- 1 tbrizend students 11752 Apr 6 16:42 .pinerc
2 -rw-r--r-- 1 tbrizend students 1434 Apr 6 16:26 .plan
2 -rw-r--r-- 1 tbrizend students 1429 Apr 8 08:23 .project
1 -rwx------ 1 tbrizend students 104 Feb 10 16:45 .prompt
1 drwx------ 2 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 8 13:27 bin
1 drwx------ 4 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 8 15:56 c
1 drwx------ 2 tbrizend students 1024 Feb 26 14:02 mail
0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 tbrizend students 11 Apr 8 08:42 p -> public_html
1 drwxr-xr-x 2 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 18 21:44 public_html
1 drwx------ 5 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 16 13:15 tmp
1 drwxr-xr-x 3 tbrizend students 1024 Apr 14 21:39 unix

me bad

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 22:02:00

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....

he's not me, or is he?
perhaps.

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 10:02 pm

I could do a Rob Swindel impresion... :) LOL

god, i musta called him 80 million times, befor long i was just say-in "hi, me again, anyway, how do i ....." ;-)

but i must say, thru the hole thing he always kept qwite a profesional attitude...

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....

only on the sync. chat board



---
■ Synchronet ■ Time Warp of the Future (360) 891-0969 Vancouver, Wa.

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Tinman on Sun Apr 18 1999 11:21 pm

he's not me, or is he?
perhaps.

Is he me?, you would never know, use-ing my bad spelling as a disgise ;-)

Am i digitial man?
Are you digital man?

/-\TiN MaN/-\


---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 10:02 pm

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....

I really wish he was. He is on the Sync chat board tho.. :)
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ Gota see the Millennium Edition MX/Z by Ski-Doo!

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 11:18 pm

bin mail public_html unix
c p tmp

This is what it looks like, but with color.
Beta

---
■ Synchronet ■ Gota see the Millennium Edition MX/Z by Ski-Doo!

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Reaper Man on Mon Apr 19 1999 11:59:00

he's not me, or is he?
perhaps.

Is he me?, you would never know, use-ing my bad spelling as a disgise ;-)

Am i digitial man?
Are you digital man?

<shrug>

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - The Board on Fire

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 10:02 pm

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....

No.
Chris



---
■ Synchronet ■ Explorer BBS - The rockn' online experence - Vancouver, Wa

RE: Baja
BY: Tinman to Beta on Sun Apr 18 1999 10:02 pm

p.s -> is digital man watching? i here rumers that he keeps tabs on sbbs's use-ing other handels....

Nope. On the odd occasion that I would log on to a BBS over the past few years, I've always used "digital man". :-)

But, now I'm watching... ;-)

Rob

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://www.talamasca-bbs.com

how do i use replace_text to replace a "multi-line" text item, such as #694 (NodeLstHdr)

---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to All on Mon Jul 24 2000 11:34 pm

how do i use replace_text to replace a "multi-line" text item, such as #694 (NodeLstHdr)

The multi-line format you see in TEXT.DAT is only a notational convenience. #694 is written on three lines but it is actually one string. The backslash immediately following the quoted string indicates that the next line should be concatenated. #694 is actually ONE STRING containing:

"*n*hNode Status<CR><LF>*c____ ___________....<etc>"

If you want to use REPLACE_TEXT to replace it, construct a string containing all the replacement, and then call REPLACE_TEXT.

(I've butchered my string up there so I could type it, but you figured that out for yourself, right?)

RE: Baja
BY: Amcleod to Hax0r on Tue Jul 25 2000 07:37 am

"*n*hNode Status<CR><LF>*c____ ___________....<etc>"

If you want to use REPLACE_TEXT to replace it, construct a string containing all the replacement, and then call REPLACE_TEXT.

(I've butchered my string up there so I could type it, but you figured that for yourself, right?)

yuppers - i figured it out and will give it a try :) It wasn't quite clear to me that the string was actually being concatinated. I'll let ya know what my experience is (if it doesn't work) hehe

---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

You know, all this recent stuff about Baja makes me almost want to start work on Sport! Shell again... :) Be prepared for stupid question! :)
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ Rover Central, Kenora Ontario, Canada

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since I am new to SBBS :) ty in advance

---
■ Synchronet ■ BGD Computers and Graphics - telnet://bgdcag.homeip.net

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since I am to SBBS :) ty in advance

just open up BAJA.DOC in your favorite text editor -- it worked for me.

in case you dont know where it is, its in the SBBS\DOCS directory



---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 02:42:00

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since I a to SBBS :) ty in advance

just open up BAJA.DOC in your favorite text editor -- it worked for me.

in case you dont know where it is, its in the SBBS\DOCS directory

hmmmm dont see it :(

---
■ Synchronet ■ BGD Computers and Graphics - telnet://bgdcag.homeip.net

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to Hax0r on Tue Sep 05 2000 08:25 am

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since to SBBS :) ty in advance

just open up BAJA.DOC in your favorite text editor -- it worked for me.

in case you dont know where it is, its in the SBBS\DOCS directory

hmmmm dont see it :(

BAJA.DOC is normally installed in your Synchronet DOCS directory. The same place you find SYSOP.DOC. Use the Windows "Find files" facility if you don't know where these files are located on your system.

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 14:29:00

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to Hax0r on Tue Sep 05 2000 08:25 am

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it sin to SBBS :) ty in advance

just open up BAJA.DOC in your favorite text editor -- it worked for me

in case you dont know where it is, its in the SBBS\DOCS directory

hmmmm dont see it :(

BAJA.DOC is normally installed in your Synchronet DOCS directory. The same place you find SYSOP.DOC. Use the Windows "Find files" facility if you don't know where these files are located on your system.

Rob

I found it, looks like it is sorta based on C, Rob you did one heck of a job writing SBBS, hope to learn the Baja and write some things being a former programmer.

Barry

---
■ Synchronet ■ BGD Computers and Graphics - telnet://bgdcag.homeip.net

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since I am n to SBBS :) ty in advance

Two things, I would sujest that you change you nick, there are a few ppl using SysOp... :) And there is a complete manual on Baja in \SBBS\DOCS\BAJA.DOC
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ Rover Central, Kenora Ontario, Canada

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to Digital Man on Tue Sep 05 2000 05:43 pm

I found it, looks like it is sorta based on C, Rob you did one heck of a jo writing SBBS, hope to learn the Baja and write some things being a former programmer.

heh, actually its not really like c at all -- more like basic. some of the ways the functions work are similar to c, but aside from that.....

it would be real nice if it wasnt as "procedural" as it is -- user defined functions would be nice, but i don't think i'm going to hold my breath.

I just hope that the next version of SBBS takes the Windows long filenames and stores them in the extended description for any files that are "recieved via ftp"




---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to Digital Man on Tue Sep 05 2000 05:43 pm

I found it, looks like it is sorta based on C, Rob you did one heck of a job writing SBBS, hope to learn the Baja and write some things being a former programmer.

You know the thing that has always amazed me? Not only the way that Rob programs, the speed of his programs, or the speed at which he is able to write new add-ons, but the fact that a programmer is able to write docs which we are all able to understand! :)
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ Rover Central, Kenora Ontario, Canada

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 07:58 pm

I just hope that the next version of SBBS takes the Windows long filenames a stores them in the extended description for any files that are "recieved via ftp"

You know that isn't a bad idea... How hard would it be, instead of dong a complete re-write to implement long file names, that you just put the long file name in the extended description? You might be able to make the FTP server recognise this, and then if someone downloads via FTP it will send them the file in long-filename..

Anythoughts Rob? Possible or completely impractical?
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ Rover Central, Kenora Ontario, Canada

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 07:58 pm

heh, actually its not really like c at all -- more like basic. some of the ways the functions work are similar to c, but aside from that.....

it would be real nice if it wasnt as "procedural" as it is -- user defined functions would be nice, but i don't think i'm going to hold my breath.

I just hope that the next version of SBBS takes the Windows long filenames a stores them in the extended description for any files that are "recieved via ftp"

I've already implemented this feature for the next release of the FTP server (but this has nothing to do with Baja). <shrug>

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 09:43 pm

I found it, looks like it is sorta based on C, Rob you did one heck of a writing SBBS, hope to learn the Baja and write some things being a former programmer.

You know the thing that has always amazed me? Not only the way that Rob programs, the speed of his programs, or the speed at which he is able to wri new add-ons, but the fact that a programmer is able to write docs which we a all able to understand! :)

Thanks for the compliment. I've had probably an equal (or greater) number of people tell me that my docs suck rocks too, so I guess it's matter of taste (or intelligence?). :-)

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Hax0r on Tue Sep 05 2000 09:47 pm

I just hope that the next version of SBBS takes the Windows long filename stores them in the extended description for any files that are "recieved ftp"

You know that isn't a bad idea... How hard would it be, instead of dong a complete re-write to implement long file names, that you just put the long f name in the extended description? You might be able to make the FTP server recognise this, and then if someone downloads via FTP it will send them the file in long-filename..

The FTP server has always recognized and supported long file names.

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Beta on Tue Sep 05 2000 09:16 pm

Thanks for the compliment. I've had probably an equal (or greater) number of people tell me that my docs suck rocks too, so I guess it's matter of taste intelligence?). :-)

Heh.. I've always found them intelligable. Even back in 1990 when I barely knew what a serial port was :)

PistolGrip

---
■ Synchronet ■ WasteLand BBS ■ telnet://wasteland.darktech.org

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Tue Sep 05 2000 09:15 pm

I've already implemented this feature for the next release of the FTP serve (but this has nothing to do with Baja). <shrug>

heh -- this means I'll have to break out the hexeditor again and hexedit SBBS.DLL again when i upgrade... humph.

Would it be possible to take some of the strings in there and put them into the text.dat file so they could be redefined in baja? hex editing SBBS.DLL to remove "via telnet" every single time you release Sync is not exactly my idea of fun.




---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Beta on Tue Sep 05 2000 09:16 pm

Thanks for the compliment. I've had probably an equal (or greater) number of people tell me that my docs suck rocks too, so I guess it's matter of taste intelligence?). :-)

I think what matters in documentation is the degree to which the writer has assumed that the audience has ample prior background knowledge and therefore will start using language short cuts. It's not necessarily and issue of the readers' intelligence. It is simple lack of factual knowledge.

(I'm beginning to loop.)
:-D

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to Digital Man on Wed Sep 06 2000 12:43 am

I've already implemented this feature for the next release of the FTP ser (but this has nothing to do with Baja). <shrug>

heh -- this means I'll have to break out the hexeditor again and hexedit SBBS.DLL again when i upgrade... humph.

Technically speaking, the change wasn't made to SBBS.DLL, it was made to FTPSRVR.DLL, but whatever you _have_ to do...

Would it be possible to take some of the strings in there and put them into the text.dat file so they could be redefined in baja?

Of course it's possible.

hex editing SBBS.DLL
remove "via telnet" every single time you release Sync is not exactly my ide of fun.

Well so far, you're the first person to appear to have problem with "via telnet", so I'll take that into consideration.

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Wed Sep 06 2000 12:42 pm

Well so far, you're the first person to appear to have problem with "via telnet", so I'll take that into consideration.

I must admit I've thought for a while that if the BBS is going essentially TELNET-only then "via TELNET" is a little redundant. I thought about "via <IP>" but I dunno if I like that either...

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Hax0r on Wed Sep 06 2000 12:42 pm

Well so far, you're the first person to appear to have problem with "via telnet", so I'll take that into consideration.

heh -- so does that mean that it wont get done? hehe

seriously, i don't have a problem with it, i just want to customize. in the end, i dont want my board to look like synchornet (no offense to the job you've done writing it) -- i just hate stock looking boards. There are probably tons of Sync BBS's out there that all look like one another (like the original), and given the fact that most callers dont post anymore (not that these stock sync bbs's have any kind of interesting discussion going on) whats to keep me calling?




---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: Amcleod to Digital Man on Wed Sep 06 2000 04:45 pm

Well so far, you're the first person to appear to have problem with "via telnet", so I'll take that into consideration.

I must admit I've thought for a while that if the BBS is going essentially TELNET-only then "via TELNET" is a little redundant.

You can still mix-match dial-up nodes, so node listing can contain dial-up users as well as telnet users and I suspect at some point I will have "via HTTP" and possibly other node/connection types.

Rob

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to Digital Man on Wed Sep 06 2000 07:06 pm

given the fact that most callers dont post anymore (not that
these stock sync bbs's have any kind of interesting discussion going on) wha to keep me calling?

hehe... games man, games! That's all anyone does anymore :)

Pistolgrip

---
■ Synchronet ■ WasteLand BBS ■ telnet://wasteland.darktech.org

RE: Baja
BY: SysOp to All on Mon Sep 04 2000 10:52 pm

Anyone has the list of Baja commands? I would like to learn it since I am n to SBBS :) ty in advance

baja.doc in the docs directory when you installed Sync.
TK

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Digital Man to Amcleod on Wed Sep 06 2000 06:04 pm

I must admit I've thought for a while that if the BBS is going essentiall TELNET-only then "via TELNET" is a little redundant.

You can still mix-match dial-up nodes, so node listing can contain dial-up users as well as telnet users and I suspect at some point I will have "via HTTP" and possibly other node/connection types.

I know dial-up is still supported, but I presumed that this was in decline, and eventually all connectivity would be net-based. "Via-HTTP" is OK with me too, when the time comes!

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to SysOp on Tue Sep 05 2000 21:43:00

new add-ons, but the fact that a programmer is able to write docs which we a all able to understand! :)

<click> woah, i never realized that...
way to go Rob!


---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - Fired Up and ready to go flamint.dyndns.org

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to Digital Man on Wed Sep 06 2000 00:43:00

the text.dat file so they could be redefined in baja? hex editing SBBS.DLL remove "via telnet" every single time you release Sync is not exactly my ide

why remove via telnet?
where is this?

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - Fired Up and ready to go flamint.dyndns.org

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Beta on Thu Sep 07 2000 10:56 am

new add-ons, but the fact that a programmer is able to write docs which w all able to understand! :)

<click> woah, i never realized that...
way to go Rob!

You ever tried to read the docs for something like RBBS? Rob's docs are awsome in my mind :)
Beta


---
■ Synchronet ■ Rover Central, Kenora Ontario, Canada

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Hax0r on Thu Sep 07 2000 11:00 am

why remove via telnet?
where is this?

if you do a node activity list it shows up there -- its arguably a very minor issue, but it is redundant (considering dialup is eventually gonna be almost gone). I just like to customize anything and everything i can, of which this is one element -- and the TEXT.DAT file is a great concept INMHO.



---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: Baja
BY: PistolGrip to Hax0r on Wed Sep 06 2000 20:35:00

given the fact that most callers dont post anymore (not that
these stock sync bbs's have any kind of interesting discussion going on) to keep me calling?

hehe... games man, games! That's all anyone does anymore :)

woah, i must be behind the times, because the ONLY reason I am usually cought lurking on a synchronet BBS is to participate in dovenet...
guess I got hooked onto the message forums a couple years back...
but I used to be an "only gamer"

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - Fired Up and ready to go flamint.dyndns.org

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to PistolGrip on Thu Sep 07 2000 15:52:00

I am a Tech for the MSN Gaming Zone, http://www.zone.com that is where I do most of my RETAIL gaming, but I am SO glad to be back in the BBS world cuz I miss the online doors. Had a blast years ago running VBBS/VA, WildCat!, and a few others. I love the was SBBS is setup, very easy to run once it is setup (that is the "FUN" part).

Great job Rob

Barry


---
■ Synchronet ■ BGD Computers and Graphics - telnet://bgdcag.homeip.net

RE: Baja
BY: Hax0r to Reaper Man on Thu Sep 07 2000 19:10:00

if you do a node activity list it shows up there -- its arguably a very mino issue, but it is redundant (considering dialup is eventually gonna be almost gone). I just like to customize anything and everything i can, of which thi is one element -- and the TEXT.DAT file is a great concept INMHO.

so would you have a string in the text.dat for each type of connection the user can make?

---
■ Synchronet ■ Flamin' Torch BBS - Fired Up and ready to go flamint.dyndns.org

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Hax0r on Fri Sep 08 2000 04:33 pm

so would you have a string in the text.dat for each type of connection the can make?

yeah, that way you could making it whatever you wanted. i just dont see why any text should have to be hardcoded into the actual program..... doing so only takes away from the power of baja. if its a text string in the text.dat file, it can be replaced to call a baja module and do whatever you want it to do, either display wise or operationally.




---
■ Synchronet ■ hax0r's palace - unknown-realm.dynip.com - you've been hax0r'd

RE: SysOp Page Help
BY: Amcleod to PistolGrip on Mon Oct 16 2000 08:13 pm

New Susop Chat Module?!!?!

If it's Split-Screen I'ma gonna puke!

Well get a bucket. Synchronet now has a split screen sysop chat. And you know for all the idiots that screamed for years for a split screen chat seem to have forgotten all about it now that we have it.
TK

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Party at AMCLEOD's
BY: Amcleod to Finnigann on Wed Oct 18 2000 06:02 am

Hey! Don't call me a weenie! :)

Ok.

Weiner!
<giggle giggle>
TK

---
■ Synchronet ■ telnet://talamasca-bbs.com http://talamasca-bbs.com

RE: Baja
BY: Reaper Man to Beta on Thu Oct 22 1998 10:00 am

RE: Baja
BY: Beta to Reaper Man on Wed Oct 21 1998 11:48 am

I don't recall reading anything about a unix clone type shell...

To whom ever it may concern, if anyone wants to write the BAJA, I made th .ASC's a little while back for this, I'm just not interested in writing t BAJA....

this is like the sdos shell right?
also would it use unix type syntax also?

I have the unix type shell somewere on my board... I think.:)

---
■ Synchronet ■ The Oblivion BBS, telnet://oblivionbbs.dns2go.com

Re: Baja
By: Hax0r to SysOp on Mon Sep 04 2000 08:42 pm

just open up BAJA.DOC in your favorite text editor -- it worked for me.

im running synch 3.10L and theres no BAJA.DOC in the \docs dir
do you mean Baja_200.new ?

|15 +o |10Rohan |00|18 27inch USA Central HQ |15|16 rohan.zapto.org

---
■ Synchronet ■ from rohan.zapto.org (rohan bbs)

Hey,

was wondering, I am working on a sysop menu in my command shell, and was wondering if there was a way I could bypass the system password prompt when I have it execute a command. I know the system password is there for security reasons, but it gets on my nerves and I really dont need it asking me for a password with each command I execute. If anyone has any knowledge how this can be done please enlighten me, I already know how to make it only allow access to level 90 or higher so this was the last bit of info i needed.

æ Dribble æ {nRk} (+o Dark Dreams)


---
■ Synchronet ■ Dark Dreams - darkdream.zapto.org

Re: Baja
By: Dribble to All on Wed Dec 03 2003 02:49 pm

was wondering, I am working on a sysop menu in my command shell, and was wondering if there was a way I could bypass the system password prompt when have it execute a command. I know the system password is there for security reasons, but it gets on my nerves and I really dont need it asking me for a password with each command I execute. If anyone has any knowledge how this can be done please enlighten me, I already know how to make it only allow access to level 90 or higher so this was the last bit of info i needed.

For most commands, yes. Are you using the str_cmds.bin module for your sysop commands? If you remove the "chksyspass" lines, that will remove the system password check for those commands.

digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #25:
The only food that does not spoil is honey.

Re: Baja
By: Digital Man to Dribble on Wed Dec 03 2003 07:56 pm

For most commands, yes. Are you using the str_cmds.bin module for your sysop commands? If you remove the "chksyspass" lines, that will remove the system password check for those commands.

Yes I was, I never bothered to check that source, cool thanks Rob

æ Dribble æ {nRk} (+o Dark Dreams)


---
■ Synchronet ■ Dark Dreams - darkdream.zapto.org

I just wanted to find out if at all possabele.

I'm looking for a way of reading from a file from my hard drive and loop threw each of the lines and print them to the screen. can any one help.

telnet://bluethunder.dtdns.net

Thanks

Joe



---
■ Synchronet ■ BlueThunder BBS bluethunder.dtdns.net

Re: Baja
By: Joe Moody to All on Sun Jun 13 2004 01:16 pm

I just wanted to find out if at all possabele.

I'm looking for a way of reading from a file from my hard drive and loop thr each of the lines and print them to the screen. can any one help.

Yes, see exec/bullseye.src for an example.

digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #28:
Chewing gum while peeling onions will prevent you from crying.

Joe Moody wrote:

I just wanted to find out if at all possabele.

I'm looking for a way of reading from a file from my hard drive and
loop threw each of the lines and print them to the screen. can any
one help.

in case you'd like a JS based solution, if you get the assault base pack
from http://www.vanguardmoddingcrew.com/ and look at the ansi_slow.js
this is basically what it does, with a small sleep after each line, so
that extra-long ansis display slower, not blasting by...

--
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)

--= Tagzilla v0.052 =--
Rules of Acquisition #025:
There's always a way out.

---
■ Synchronet ■ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it

I been wanting to find out if theres a way to load information from a text file and be able to give each one I load a var. If you can under stand what I'm talking about. I want to be able to fopen a file and load each line in and give each line I readin it's own varable.

and is there any way to setup an array with Baja, Rob doesn't have any plans on added it to Baja


Thanks

joesoft11a@hotmail.com



---
■ Synchronet ■ Blue Thunder - bluethunder.dtdns.net