~WEB~ BBSes are new to me, i thought i could tolerate this interface
but the obvious lack of security is what i'd call a deterrent, in
favour of plain old DialUp/~TelNet~ BBSing, i mean...
How is this any more secure than an unencrypted HTTP connection?
A text-based BBS could be made less insecure by enabling SSH...
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,045 |
Nodes: | 17 (2 / 15) |
Uptime: | 06:15:21 |
Calls: | 501,707 |
Calls today: | 34 |
Files: | 104,420 |
D/L today: |
21,740 files (5,378M bytes) |
Messages: | 298,320 |
Posted today: | 2 |