~WEB~ BBSes are new to me, i thought i could tolerate this interface
but the obvious lack of security is what i'd call a deterrent, in
favour of plain old DialUp/~TelNet~ BBSing, i mean...
How is this any more secure than an unencrypted HTTP connection?
A text-based BBS could be made less insecure by enabling SSH...
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,035 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 42:43:11 |
Calls: | 788 |
Calls today: | 13 |
Files: | 95,174 |
U/L today: |
3 files (8K bytes) |
D/L today: |
11,535 files (572M bytes) |
Messages: | 299,667 |