Quoting Stephen Hurd to Nancy Backus on 11-23-04 11:51 <=-
Re: Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOT
By: Nancy Backus to Stephen Hurd on Mon Nov 22 2004 23:35:03
In my case, it wasn't what I wanted so much as what I needed. I was
very thankful to find that 7-bit paranoid Kermit available when it was,
so that I was* able to upload my message reply packets, and not have to enter messages online. Now that hubby has replaced TCPPort in our
set-up with his TelNetPort, things work a lot better, and I can now use Zmodem for my telnet uploads as well, and still entirely work in DOS. :)
Out of curiosity, was FTP or HTTP not an option?
Also, my main concern was to continue getting message packets from the offline mail doors on the BBS, and to reply via the reply packets for
the same, having read/replied offline. Would that have been do-able via
FTP and HTTP, especially still using my Bluewave Reader?
Quoting Stephen Hurd to Nancy Backus on 11-28-04 00:22 <=-
Re: Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit
By: Nancy Backus to Stephen Hurd on Sat Nov 27 2004 22:45:10
Also, my main concern was to continue getting message packets from the offline mail doors on the BBS, and to reply via the reply packets for
the same, having read/replied offline. Would that have been do-able via
FTP and HTTP, especially still using my Bluewave Reader?
Synchronet supports QWK via FTP, but not HTTP (yet)
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,034 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:23:49 |
Calls: | 668 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 95,163 |
D/L today: |
577 files (83,314K bytes) |
Messages: | 299,366 |