/usr/local/sbin/binkd -p -P $node /usr/local/etc/binkd.cfg
/usr/local/sbin/binkd -p -P $node /usr/local/etc/binkd.cfg
After testing with this... this seems to be the SOLUTION.
I don't know but going back over my notes.. shows that I never used /that/ line...
AND
That binkd at least here has a fit over
-pP but if its -p -P its fine...
Who knows....its pretty common at least for me to combine things up
like -pP or say -abcP and put anything requiring an argument with it
at the end... guess not for this program...
Not sure why changing the node in the config causes -nP to fail, as thats in my notes to work, and add as a cron job...
/usr/local/sbin/binkd -p -P $node /usr/local/etc/binkd.cfgAfter testing with this... this seems to be the SOLUTION.
-pP but if its -p -P its fine...
Who knows....its pretty common at least for me to combine things up
like -pP or say -abcP and put anything requiring an argument with it
at the end... guess not for this program...
Weird...
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
It would be better if you checked BEFORE you do that if that particular programs supports that.
Not really ... works as expected!
yes... i had thought that someone else would mention it to you... i started to at least twice but it slipped my mind while watching the
thread unroll...
definitely not for this program...
It is all documented in the man page:
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
-pP but if its -p -P its fine...
As documented in the documentation!
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
It would be better if you checked BEFORE you do that if that
particular programs supports that. Not really ... works as
expected!
Thanks, read that. Thats where I got the initial test I did of -pP
No, that is not documented that it HAS TO BE SPACED OUT as ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT. It may mean that to you, it doesn't to me, nor any other Linux program I've used... options can be shoved together. Shove them
all together is pretty much bog standard procedure for any *Nix/BSD
I've used.
Never had a program specifically need to S P A C E things out, and
that man page doesn't mean that. When I read it thats binkd -options config file.
Additionally, since I got the option for -nP from this group,
"You can do that manually, but you can also do it by typing:
binkd -nP46:1/100 binkd.cfg."
Msg from 3/4/16.
and tried it and it worked fine... and it was most definitely not
spaced out. You see I test things copiously before doing, ie: measure, measure, measure, cut.
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
That line doesn't mean CAN'T SHOVE THEM ALL TOGETHER... When any other Linux program I've used will gladly take them -alloptions or -a -b
-cdeg -gf
It is all documented in the man page:
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
-pP but if its -p -P its fine...
As documented in the documentation!
Yes. But all these do work here to poll to 2:221/1:
# binkd -p -P 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
Using "Binkd 1.1a-94 (Oct 23 2016 10:28:34/Linux)"
Yes. But all these do work here to poll to 2:221/1:As I mentioned in a previous message, this was probably addressed in a version later than the one available from Debian's repositories, since I believe that version is still 1.0.9 or something, and not even 1.1a
# binkd -p -P 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
Using "Binkd 1.1a-94 (Oct 23 2016 10:28:34/Linux)"
which has been in development for years.
If one wants all the goodies and fixes, they must compile binkd
themselves, or possibly see if someone else would do it for them. *shrug*
If one wants all the goodies and fixes, they must compile binkd
themselves, or possibly see if someone else would do it for them.
*shrug*
'Apt install binkd' gave me 1.0.4 to my ubuntu testbox.
SYNOPSISThanks, read that. Thats where I got the initial test I did of -pP
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
No, that is not documented that it HAS TO BE SPACED OUT as ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT.
It is all documented in the man page:
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
Yes. But all these do work here to poll to 2:221/1:
# binkd -p -P 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP 2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP2:221/1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
# binkd -pP1 /etc/binkd/binkd.cfg
Using "Binkd 1.1a-94 (Oct 23 2016 10:28:34/Linux)"
If one wants all the goodies and fixes, they must compile binkd
themselves, or possibly see if someone else would do it for them.
*shrug*
'Apt install binkd' gave me 1.0.4 to my ubuntu testbox.
cat /etc/issue
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
Thanks, read that. Thats where I got the initial test I did of -pP
No, that is not documented that it HAS TO BE SPACED OUT as ABSOLUTE
REQUIREMENT.
It clearly shows that this is how it is supposed to be entered.
But to calm you down, it also works if you do *NOT* use a space.
Nice optional addition of the Binkd authors.
If one wants all the goodies and fixes, they must compile binkd
themselves, or possibly see if someone else would do it for them.
*shrug*
'Apt install binkd' gave me 1.0.4 to my ubuntu testbox.
cat /etc/issue
tommi@boy:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS \n \l
And now:
tommi@boy:~$ /usr/sbin/binkd -vv
Binkd 1.1a-94 (Oct 23 2016 11:30:20/Linux)
Compilation flags: gcc, zlib, bzlib2.
Facilities: fts5004 ipv6
'Apt install binkd' gave me 1.0.4 to my ubuntu testbox.
SYNOPSIS
binkd [-CcDipqrsvdmh] [ -P node ] config-file
Thanks, read that. Thats where I got the initial test I did of
-pP No, that is not documented that it HAS TO BE SPACED OUT as
ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT.
It clearly shows that this is how it is supposed to be entered.
But to calm you down, it also works if you do *NOT* use a space.
Nice optional addition of the Binkd authors.
fido@odroid:~$ /usr/local/sbin/binkd -pP 2:313/41
/usr/local/etc/binkd.cfg 16:08 [11054] BEGIN, binkd/1.1a-75/Linux -pP 2:313/41 /usr/local/etc/binkd.cfg 16:08 [11054] creating a poll for 2:313/41@fidonet (`d' flavour) [...]
I'm fairly certain he's using the version from the Debian repositories, which is 1.0.4.
He may not have that option to not use a space, which is definitely
doable in the 1.1a versions.
'Apt install binkd' gave me 1.0.4 to my ubuntu testbox.
Exactly. I'm fairly certain 1.1a has been in development for quite some time now (5+ or 10+ years?).
So while 1.0.4 may be labeled as the "stable" version, it is still missing much of the current development.
I'm fairly certain he's using the version from the Debian
repositories, which is 1.0.4.
sorry, it is not... ubuntu 14.04 (aka trusty) only has 0.9.11 as i
noted previously... ubuntu 16.04 brings 1.0.4 to the table... trusty's
old version is explicitly why i decided to build my own... especially
when i was able to run a newer version on my much older OS/2 system ;)
He may not have that option to not use a space, which is
definitely doable in the 1.1a versions.
even without the documentation being updated ;)
So while 1.0.4 may be labeled as the "stable" version, it is
still missing much of the current development.
"2016/03/28 18:29:09 1.1a-94 git"
7 months and one day old... Works perfectly. Time to release as
stable?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,027 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 62:14:24 |
Calls: | 502,334 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 100,779 |
D/L today: |
10,662 files (940M bytes) |
Messages: | 300,074 |