If I get a FReq via BinkD, what exactly am I looking for? File name? Contents?
Ben Ritchey wrote to All on 05-19-17 20:09 <=-
Hi All,
If I get a FReq via BinkD, what exactly am I looking for? File name? Contents?
Ben Ritchey wrote to Bill Mcgarrity on 05-20-17 11:37 <=-
* On Saturday 20 May 2017 140 at 11:01 AM,
* Bill McGarrity said to Ben Ritchey,
* about FReqs ...
*
Thanks Bill :)
Thanks Bill :)
What aspect are you looking at?
I'm using Mystic so no Bink cfg file (BinkD is built in) I seem to
need the format of the .srf file which I found in a BinkD distribution package (!SRIF.Txt) though it's a bit cryptic. Need a sample! lol
What aspect are you looking at?
If I have to code something I will, I'm just looking to know how to
tell someone has freq'd a file from my system and what to expect in
the freq for return node, etc. I'm using Mystic so no Bink cfg file
(BinkD is built in) I seem to need the format of the .srf file which I found in a BinkD distribution package (!SRIF.Txt) though it's a bit cryptic. Need a sample! lol
some notes, drop file examples, the batch and the BFDS utils it
needed. You're welcome to FREQ it from -this- node as "srif_req.zip",
* An ongoing debate between Paul Quinn and Ben Ritchey rages on ...
If I have to code something I will, I'm just looking to know how to
tell someone has freq'd a file from my system
and what to expect in the
freq for return node, etc. I'm using Mystic so no Bink cfg file
(BinkD is built in)
I seem to need the format of the .srf file which I found in a BinkD distribution package (!SRIF.Txt) though it's a bit cryptic. Need a
sample! lol
That depends on how Mystic works... You could always check you
inbound for a *.Req file and take it from there, and delete it when
you are done processing it.
If you want I could put together a step by step set of instructions
based on what I did for FREQ-U
* An ongoing debate between Fred Riccio and Ben Ritchey rages on ...
{chuckle} Once I figure out WHEN and WHAT to process a FReq
FreqU will be the 1st thing I test!
Thanks ... will FreqU work without a BinkD config file?
If not, can I just dummy one up?
Again, it depends on Mystic. What would happen if someone sends you a .Req file? Does Mystic build a *.Srf or will it be ignored? It think
It will only work if Mystic generates an SRIF file.
* An ongoing debate between Fred Riccio and Ben Ritchey rages on ...
Or if I gen one from the log info? Seems all I need is return addy?
Also required is the path/name of the .Req file and the path to your outbound where the *.?lo files are kept.
Can Mystic execute a DOS command when it receives a *.req file?
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
Also required is the path/name of the .Req file and the path to your
outbound where the *.?lo files are kept.
Can Mystic execute a DOS command when it receives a *.req file?
Yes
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
1.1a-89 it says :)
Can Mystic execute a DOS command when it receives a *.req file?
Yes
That's not really even an option. It's no good if Mystic drops
carrier on a current session. Working in absentia from the calling
node isn't what FREQ-ing is all about, as you know.
Ben & company need to press for SRIF support in Mystic when a FREQ transaction is attempted. It's relatively simple for software maintainers to implement... in my simplistic view of the universe.
;-)
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
1.1a-89 it says :)
A session with Ben's system reports...
: 21-May-2017 15:35:38 Mailer : Mystic/1.12A33 binkp/1.0
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
1.1a-89 it says :)
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
1.1a-89 it says :)
A session with Ben's system reports...
: 21-May-2017 15:35:38 Mailer : Mystic/1.12A33 binkp/1.0
So Ben needs to upgrade from A33 to A89 in order to get File requests to work?
Unless... The BinkP/1.0 optional extension "multiple batch mode" (FSP-1021.001 / FRL-1018.001) was implemented by Mystic. I highly
doubt this because I havent seen his Mystic send "OPT MB" in any
session we have had, but it *does* appear with his (and others'
systems) IREX 2.29 mailer.
Can Mystic execute a DOS command when it receives a *.req file?
Yes
That's not really even an option. It's no good if Mystic drops
carrier on a current session. Working in absentia from the calling
node isn't what FREQ-ing is all about, as you know.
I'm not following you here. Are you saying than Mystic *can* do it, but only after the BinkP session ends? I guess what I should have asked is
if Mystic can do it asynchronously, or in another thread.
Ben & company need to press for SRIF support in Mystic when a FREQ
transaction is attempted. It's relatively simple for software
maintainers to implement... in my simplistic view of the universe.
;-)
Or native support of FREQs. Back in the olden days the more popular mailers had FREQ built in. No SRIF or add-on processors needed. It was the newer developers who dropped support for it.
Does Mystic truely support BinkP 1.1 or does it just fake it?
1.1a-89 it says :)
A session with Ben's system reports...
: 21-May-2017 15:35:38 Mailer : Mystic/1.12A33 binkp/1.0
So Ben needs to upgrade from A33 to A89 in order to get File requests to work?
Unless... The BinkP/1.0 optional extension "multiple batch mode" (FSP-1021.001 / FRL-1018.001) was implemented by Mystic. I highly doubt this because I havent seen his Mystic send "OPT MB" in any session we
have had, but it *does* appear with his (and others' systems) IREX 2.29 mailer.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,023 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 12:39:21 |
Calls: | 502,255 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 103,940 |
D/L today: |
11,197 files (3,150M bytes) |
Messages: | 299,736 |