1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FE HELP

  • Dupes

    From Paul Quinn@3:640/384 to Mark Lewis on Saturday, March 03, 2012 10:24:00
    Hi! mark,

    A quick question or three, if I may... Does it make any sense to retain the messages tossed to the dupe area, for any great length of time?

    FE maintains a dupe database doesn't it? So, any messages there are just for the sysops perusal... to fix any routing or link problems, aren't they?

    Cheers,
    Paul.

    ---
    * Origin: In CyberSpace, no one can hear you scream. (3:640/384)
  • From steven leeman@2:292/624.1 to Paul Quinn on Saturday, March 03, 2012 09:52:04
    Hello, Paul!

    03 Mar 12 10:24, from Paul Quinn -> Mark Lewis, in URL area://fe_help?msgid=3:640/384+17f367ec:

    A quick question or three, if I may... Does it make any sense to
    retain the messages tossed to the dupe area, for any great length of
    time?

    FE maintains a dupe database doesn't it? So, any messages there are
    just for the sysops perusal... to fix any routing or link problems,
    aren't they?
    yes...
    certainly when you have stuff connected through more than 1 uplink
    or when you have run a few times "%rescan" at your uplink

    Best Regards, steven
    --- SkyNETbbs in action!
    * Origin: It is a good day to write fidomail (2:292/624.1)
  • From Paul Quinn@3:640/384 to Steven Leeman on Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:16:00
    Hi! steven,

    On Sat, 03 Mar 12, you wrote to me:

    FE maintains a dupe database doesn't it? So, any messages there
    are just for the sysops perusal... to fix any routing or link
    problems, aren't they?
    yes... certainly when you have stuff connected through more than 1
    uplink

    That's what is happening now. I have over 1.100 messages in the dupe area. I might set the maintenance to keep them for 3 days only and be done with them.

    or when you have run a few times "%rescan" at your uplink

    I found out how -not- to do that too many times on a test system here (with Crashmail). I started off with copying the JAM files to the system and then commenced forwarding messages to it, and then did a %rescan. Of course, a lot of dupes made it into the echo areas since the original messages' data had never been entered into the dupe database. A definite 'no no'. I deserve a smack! for that. :)

    Cheers,
    Paul.

    ---
    * Origin: Humpty dumpty was pushed. (3:640/384)