I can say don't use the latest linux version 5.21 rar to run rar c <filehdr rar has some error there not work with put file header to rar splits files. the old linux version 5.20 is better to do with.
when do rar 5.21 to
rar c "file.r*" <filegate.hdr
gives error by run this in the split of rar files.
I can say don't use the latest linux version 5.21 rar to run rar c <filehdr rar has some error there not work with put file header to rar splits files. the old linux version 5.20 is better to do with.
when do rar 5.21 to
rar c "file.r*" <filegate.hdr
gives error by run this in the split of rar files.
* Forwarded from area 'FILEGATE'
Hi Gert,
I can say don't use the latest linux version 5.21 rar to run rar c
<filehdr rar has some error there not work with put file header to rar
splits files. the old linux version 5.20 is better to do with.
when do rar 5.21 to
rar c "file.r*" <filegate.hdr
gives error by run this in the split of rar files.
I just used the newest version, 5.30 and it is working fine.
I used this syntax to comment the file I tested:
rar c chatto.rar -zfilegate.hdr
I don't use the < (redirection, or greater-than symbol), I use -z as
above.
Does that work for you?
I can say don't use the latest linux version 5.21 rar to run rar c
<filehdr rar has some error there not work with put file header to rar
splits files. the old linux version 5.20 is better to do with.
when do rar 5.21 to
rar c "file.r*" <filegate.hdr
gives error by run this in the split of rar files.
I just used the newest version, 5.30 and it is working fine.
I used this syntax to comment the file I tested:
rar c chatto.rar -zfilegate.hdr
I don't use the < (redirection, or greater-than symbol), I use -z as
above.
Does that work for you?
I used this syntax to comment the file I tested:
rar c chatto.rar -zfilegate.hdr
I don't use the < (redirection, or greater-than symbol), I use -z as
above.
Does that work for you?
Yes now is it work again.
zip -z @FILE <fgate.hdr
if it is a rar file is I now using rar c "filename.r*" -zfgate.hdr
but it is only for MACOS files there is bigger than linux and Windows files.
So it works with rar again, there some PASMAC file for fpc300 (Free Pacacal compiler).
I used this syntax to comment the file I tested:
rar c chatto.rar -zfilegate.hdr
I don't use the < (redirection, or greater-than symbol), I use -z as
above.
Does that work for you?
Yes now is it work again.
Good. I was hoping it was something like that causing the problem :)
zip -z @FILE <fgate.hdr
if it is a rar file is I now using rar c "filename.r*" -zfgate.hdr
but it is only for MACOS files there is bigger than linux and Windows
files.
Ok, makes sense.
So it works with rar again, there some PASMAC file for fpc300 (Free
Pacacal compiler).
Glad to hear it. I've always used rar in this way (-zfile.hdr). I
never have used the redirection symbol with it. I guess just a habit
:)
Good. I was hoping it was something like that causing the problem :)
There must be something there got changed in rar of add header from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1 and after it.
My way to get installed rar and unrar and other packers is by gentoo's emerge rar and the file name.
the linux system by gentoo as emerge is not full updated for rar and unrar, it
takes v5.2.1 and 5.1.6
but with zip and unzip has it the newest version now.
Glad to hear it. I've always used rar in this way (-zfile.hdr). I
never have used the redirection symbol with it. I guess just a habit
:)
It makes now that my gmsnet has a new working rar files for dmd1155M and there
is to soon come dmd1156 there is on way in the next day, as it got for both linux, Windows and maybe MAC OS too as version Dooms Engine 1.15.6
dmdX is Doomsday Engine complete files
dde200X is Doomsday Engine build xxxx files
So only complete version is full version and dde200 is 2.0.0 in work with buil
versions.
Good. I was hoping it was something like that causing the problem :)
There must be something there got changed in rar of add header from
5.2.0 to 5.2.1 and after it.
Probably... or maybe in the libraries of gentoo. And then again, I'm
running an older version of Ubuntu, v12.5 LTS, I think. I don't know
about the most recent version of Ubuntu :)
My way to get installed rar and unrar and other packers is by gentoo's
emerge rar and the file name.
the linux system by gentoo as emerge is not full updated for rar and
unrar, it takes v5.2.1 and 5.1.6
but with zip and unzip has it the newest version now.
Understand. :)
Glad to hear it. I've always used rar in this way (-zfile.hdr). I
never have used the redirection symbol with it. I guess just a habit
:)
It makes now that my gmsnet has a new working rar files for dmd1155M and
there is to soon come dmd1156 there is on way in the next day, as it got
for both linux, Windows and maybe MAC OS too as version Dooms Engine
1.15.6 dmdX is Doomsday Engine complete files
dde200X is Doomsday Engine build xxxx files
So only complete version is full version and dde200 is 2.0.0 in work with
buil versions.
So far, some people have let me know in email and netmail that they are
not interested in the Windows versions of those games. The files are
too large, and they just jam up their systems because of the total
size. Splitting doesn't help, because still the "original" same file
length must go out <g>.
So you can stop sending me the Windows games files. I guess people can
get it themselves online if they want it.
I have not heard any complaints about the MAC versions though, so if
they are not gigantic, I can send those out if you send them over here.
Again, I don't like sending out anything larger than 30M though. It's
just too big :(
I have not heard any complaints about the MAC versions though, so if
I have not heard any complaints about the MAC versions though, so if
probably because there are few to no MAC users in fidonet any more... if there
are, they get their files from the internet like 99% of the other folks do these days...
I have not heard any complaints about the MAC versions though, so
if they are not gigantic, I can send those out if you send them
over here. Again, I don't like sending out anything larger than
30M though. It's just too big :(
The Windows version of those games is about 30-32M and the MACOS is
more Large like 50M so it is been split to be about 16-20M for each
files.
I have not heard any complaints about the MAC versions though, so
if they are not gigantic, I can send those out if you send them
over here. Again, I don't like sending out anything larger than
30M though. It's just too big :(
The Windows version of those games is about 30-32M and the MACOS is
more Large like 50M so it is been split to be about 16-20M for each
files.
The Win games (engines) are updated weekly or more often.
Any one interested in them can get 'the' latest via their url.
We do not need this file being updated and sent out within filegate so
often.
I have not had any downloads of these files so for me are a complete
waste of
bandwidth - Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds e.g., 40-50
Kb.
We do not need this file being updated and sent out within filegate
so often.
I have not had any downloads of these files so for me are a complete
waste of bandwidth - Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds
e.g., 40-50 Kb.
The dde200W files is send to Janis once a week and the dmd115XW is
only been updated as new version once a month.
I have not had any downloads of these files so for me are a complete waste of bandwidth
Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds e.g., 40-50 Kb.
I have not had any downloads of these files so for me are a complete
waste of bandwidth
Same for me.. I would bet that's true even for the Linux versions...
Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds e.g., 40-50 Kb.
Yes, sometimes I can't believe how the U.S. handles upload/download
speeds :( We have about 58Mbps Download, and on a good day, 5.8 Mbps upload.. god forbid the cable provider should give people the same download speed as their upload speed :( :(
I can switch you to crash send, Vince.. that will help a lot. My
system crashes mail and files to a lot of people, so it won't hurt to
send to you that way.
Hi Vince!
I have not had any downloads of these files so for me are a complete
waste of bandwidth
Same for me.. I would bet that's true even for the Linux versions...
Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds e.g., 40-50 Kb.
Yes, sometimes I can't believe how the U.S. handles upload/download
speeds :( We have about 58Mbps Download, and on a good day, 5.8 Mbps upload.. god forbid the cable provider should give people the same
download speed as their upload speed :( :(
I can switch you to crash send, Vince.. that will help a lot. My
system crashes mail and files to a lot of people, so it won't hurt to
send to you that way.
same here and likely on most every other BBS carrying the area in question...
Janis's system as she has slow upload speeds e.g., 40-50 Kb.
Yes, sometimes I can't believe how the U.S. handles upload/download
speeds :( We have about 58Mbps Download, and on a good day, 5.8 Mbps
upload.. god forbid the cable provider should give people the same
download speed as their upload speed :( :(
it is a commercialization problem... greedy fscks and bean counters are runnin
the ops, these days... the thought is that the majority of transactions are downloads to the client systems... anything that is running servers should be paying for commercial access for uploading speeds to be equal or greater than download speeds...
I can switch you to crash send, Vince.. that will help a lot. My
system crashes mail and files to a lot of people, so it won't hurt to
send to you that way.
that might help but it depends on your upload speed and how full your pipe is at the time of the transfer...
I can switch you to crash send, Vince.. that will help a lot. My
system crashes mail and files to a lot of people, so it won't hurt to
send to you that way.
Sounds like a plan - please do so and after a few days I will switch off polling you. That way you can send to me when your system has light traffic processes running - may be.
My broadband seems to have increased over the last month or so from 8 Mb / 800Kb to 18Mb down / 1.2Mb up.
The new house will have speeds from 40, 74, 100, 150 - its more a question of >wallet and as we are retired it will be the most cost effective one that gives
20Mb upload and 70 - 80 down.
At least that way, my downlinks can get their files and be gone quickly.
Not that my system is being stretched in any way with a 8 core AMD FX 8350. Read that as a 4 core Intel type - AMD lie.
At least that way, my downlinks can get their files and be gone
quickly. Not that my system is being stretched in any way with a 8
core AMD FX 8350. Read that as a 4 core Intel type - AMD lie.
I know what you mean there :) Still sounds like a good system.
This is an HP 5 core... does the job, and I grabbed it in a pinch when
my last system died.. we don't usually buy prebuilt systems but this
one was there, and I was in a hurry... Works for me :)
At least that way, my downlinks can get their files and be gone
quickly. Not that my system is being stretched in any way with a 8
core AMD FX 8350. Read that as a 4 core Intel type - AMD lie.
I know what you mean there :) Still sounds like a good system.
This is an HP 5 core... does the job, and I grabbed it in a pinch when
my last system died.. we don't usually buy prebuilt systems but this
one was there, and I was in a hurry... Works for me :)
Sound like on a par a midrange 4 core assuming below i4770 (which was the last
time I looked) before going AMD - a lot cheaper for mobo, cpu etc.
Should
have
saved up a bit more though but it does the job as there are 212 processes and load is around zero with uploads occuring but the ibm mainframe stuff is not running yet.
Keep well,
I don't pay much attention these days Lol.. I know this much (found
out after the fact of the purchase of course) Core i7s are better than
Core i5s, which better than Core i3s... and I know Core i7 CPUs are generaslly found in high-end, expensive laptops and PCs.. and this
isn't icore7 hehe.. we have an icore 7 mb in the works for whichever
one of us gets motivated to finish the install of that MB - that is no
easy task, believe me. It is so darn easy to bend pins on the cpu
slot, it's insane. I sure don't care to try it.. maybe Ron or Matt
will one day.
So it works with rar again, there some PASMAC file for fpc300 (Free
Pacacal compiler).
good
----- 70-persistent-net.rules begins -----
# This file was automatically generated by the
/lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
# PCI device 0x1186:0x1300 (8139too)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:22:22:22:11:11", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
# PCI device 0x8086:0x1050 (e100)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:22:22:22:00:00", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
----- 70-persistent-net.rules ends -----
possible this helps you to get gentoo back ?
now i have backup here, if you use my backup change the mac addresses
It is not the rule file for it by it is in /etc/init.d/ the net.lo and net.eth0 give problems by gentoo fido2 not read the networkd ethnet
files as it shall. By more that the net.lo file have some problems to work with thet other net.eth* files
It is not the rule file for it by it is in /etc/init.d/ the net.lo and
net.eth0 give problems by gentoo fido2 not read the networkd ethnet
files as it shall. By more that the net.lo file have some problems to
work with thet other net.eth* files
why do you ask me about help if you dont listen ?
stop wasting your time
It is not the rule file for it by it is in /etc/init.d/ the net.lo
and net.eth0 give problems by gentoo fido2 not read the networkd
ethnet files as it shall. By more that the net.lo file have some
problems to work with thet other net.eth* files
why do you ask me about help if you dont listen ?
I listen to you but the problem was not that the net rule file not working it was that the interfaces not got startup and it got to look like it there was either the kernel there not got read the net.* as it should so it not got load and start net.lo net.eth0 and net.eth1
After several tries with the sysrescuecd cdrom startup was it not the netcards or the others, by sys rescue find and startup the netcard but with the new names and when I tried to use and try out using the
harddisk boot read sda3 configs sda1 as the cdrom sys rescue was it on the harddisk sda3 net files there seem to have errors in it for the network by right reading the net.* files.
When I then testing the net.* files and move the net.lo to another tmp path and reboot was it like there seem to something got begin to work
and by just copy net.eth0 to a net.lo file got the netcards to startup but some is still missing by boot up as there is nothing show on the monitor of the ip adresses.
stop wasting your time
It is not the rule file for it by it is in /etc/init.d/ the net.lo
and net.eth0 give problems by gentoo fido2 not read the networkd
ethnet files as it shall. By more that the net.lo file have some
problems to work with thet other net.eth* files
why do you ask me about help if you dont listen ?
I listen to you but the problem was not that the net rule file not
working it was that the interfaces not got startup and it got to look
like it there was either the kernel there not got read the net.* as it
should so it not got load and start net.lo net.eth0 and net.eth1
you know what ?, your problem is to listen to when other say whats the
problem(s) is, its not a single problem you have its more then one, i
started with telling what to do first, and then you can tell me why you
edit net.lo file, dont ever do that !
After several tries with the sysrescuecd cdrom startup was it not the
netcards or the others, by sys rescue find and startup the netcard but
with the new names and when I tried to use and try out using the
harddisk boot read sda3 configs sda1 as the cdrom sys rescue was it on
the harddisk sda3 net files there seem to have errors in it for the
network by right reading the net.* files.
there is NOTHING to recover so that why it does not work to use
systemresque cd
When I then testing the net.* files and move the net.lo to another tmp
path and reboot was it like there seem to something got begin to work
and by just copy net.eth0 to a net.lo file got the netcards to startup
but some is still missing by boot up as there is nothing show on the
monitor of the ip adresses.
net.eth0 is a symlink to net.lo, you must still NOT edit the file
maybe i should listen to my own advise ?
It is not the rule file for it by it is in /etc/init.d/ the net.lo
and net.eth0 give problems by gentoo fido2 not read the networkd
ethnet files as it shall. By more that the net.lo file have some
problems to work with thet other net.eth* files
why do you ask me about help if you dont listen ?
I listen to you but the problem was not that the net rule file not
working it was that the interfaces not got startup and it got to look
like it there was either the kernel there not got read the net.* as it
should so it not got load and start net.lo net.eth0 and net.eth1
you know what ?, your problem is to listen to when other say whats the
problem(s) is, its not a single problem you have its more then one, i
started with telling what to do first, and then you can tell me why you
edit net.lo file, dont ever do that !
After several tries with the sysrescuecd cdrom startup was it not the
netcards or the others, by sys rescue find and startup the netcard but
with the new names and when I tried to use and try out using the
harddisk boot read sda3 configs sda1 as the cdrom sys rescue was it on
the harddisk sda3 net files there seem to have errors in it for the
network by right reading the net.* files.
there is NOTHING to recover so that why it does not work to use
systemresque cd
When I then testing the net.* files and move the net.lo to another tmp
path and reboot was it like there seem to something got begin to work
and by just copy net.eth0 to a net.lo file got the netcards to startup
but some is still missing by boot up as there is nothing show on the
monitor of the ip adresses.
net.eth0 is a symlink to net.lo, you must still NOT edit the file
stop wasting your time
maybe i should listen to my own advise ?
Regards Benny
... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)
-+- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.4.3-gentoo (i686))
+ Origin: openvpn on its way here (2:230/0)
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,039 |
| Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 198:19:57 |
| Calls: | 500,233 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 95,197 |
| D/L today: |
553 files (501M bytes) |
| Messages: | 464,137 |