The only fidonet policy i can find is v4.07 from 1989!!
is there a newer version as that is so dated?
this echo is future of fido, the policy must be one of the first things looked at, esp as 99.9% do not use dialup and use it as a HOBBY,
... Nine times out of ten the statisticians are wrong
The only fidonet policy i can find is v4.07 from 1989!!
is there a newer version as that is so dated?
The only fidonet policy i can find is v4.07 from 1989!!
is there a newer version as that is so dated?
this echo is future of fido, the policy must be one of the first
things looked at, esp as 99.9% do not use dialup and use it as a
HOBBY,
this echo is future of fido, the policy must be one of the firstGood luck with that! ;-)
things looked at, esp as 99.9% do not use dialup and use it as a
HOBBY,
Have you read the policy? Which parts of it should be changed due to technological evolution?some of the wording is a bit dated, i.e references to Mail Hour, phone numbers, 2.2 even asks for a phone number on application and maximum baud rate!! even tho I know there are still some that use dial up, (how do you connect?) its not how MOST future and present possible applicants will be connecting to the (fido)Net.
* Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS from Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
It is the lastest, and not even recognised by most of the fidonet sysops. Good luck with that! ;-)
----------------------- DITO ------------------------
You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
(2:292/854)
The only fidonet policy i can find is v4.07 from 1989!!
is there a newer version as that is so dated?
You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
what nodelist did you check?
The current one ... this is your entry ... Down,9,Paranormal_Panorama_BBS,Hull_E._Yorkshire,Owen_Evers,-Unpublished-,You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
continously ... down ... and your system unreachable...it is not continuously ... (extra 'U') ... down.
... which is why you are accessing here from a BBS in another Fidonet-zone.
not a very nice attitude from a Zone 2 hat.. again the policy says
encourage membership... ? not post comments as you have. very
un-encouraging and now has become annoying. see the policy if you
want to know what that means.
----------------------- DITO ------------------------
You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
How did you find it? ;)
https://nodehist.fidonet.org.ua/?name=Owen+Evers
The current one ... this is your entry ...shed-,
Down,9,Paranormal_Panorama_BBS,Hull_E._Yorkshire,Owen_Evers,-Unpubli
So it is listed!!!!
and down as I have some things that have priority over a hobby to sort
out first.
it is not continuously ... (extra 'U') ... down.
My system is not unreachable by who i let connect, and only marked as...
I asked for HOLD also so why try to POLL ?
not a very nice attitude from a Zone 2 hat.. again the policy says encourage membership... ? not post comments as you have. very un-encouraging and now has become annoying. see the policy if you want to know what that means.
All because i thought the policy could do with bringing upto date from
the 80's, and in your position should be something you also want.
This discussion could have been productive if you were approachable, you never even commented on what I thought was outdated, just choose to be derogatory.
I hope other HATS see this and how your attitude has been.
1/ I am surprized you would consider me to be an idiot who needsYour pulling words out of no where, obviously didn't read my message or chose to ignore it, where did I say you are an idiot?
If it were an available node. even in its down-status, the guy would WD> not need to access Fido via a BBS in Z3.READ MY OTHER MESSAGE, my system never got this echo.
instruction on how to look up things. Really?Your quoting a message from someone else, not you searching. all you needed to do is look in the list its self, like this ,2,Eur_(365),B,Ward_Dossche,...........many-glacier.dyndns.org
https://nodehist.fidonet.org.ua/?name=Owen+Evers
Your request didn't make it to your NC as he is unable to contact you, hence he slammed ",Down" on you.Oh yes it did, what happened after it made it there is another story.
Buddy ... I can recite Policy by heart after all these years, pleaseIts what one does with the knowledge that matters. you choose to ignore it.
don't wave it in front of my eyes as if I'm not knowledgeable ...
out of nowhere, thinking they know it all, spilling all their new ideas (which actually were already tabled 25 years ago) which in the end went nowhere ...ok, I don't think I know it all, where did that come from? As your clearly unaware, its new ideas that make progress happen, and without progress there is stagnation. As you have been involved for 28 years, that explains a lot. WD> My attitude is inspired by 28 years in the driver's seat and having seen WD> enough nonsense to know what I'm talking about.
You're not even a listed sysop ... why should you care?
How did you find it? ;)
https://nodehist.fidonet.org.ua/?name=Owen+Evers
1/ I am surprized you would consider me to be an idiot who needs instruction
on how to look up things. Really?
2/ ",Down" ... a rose by any other name still is a rose ...
unreachable
...
unlisted ... unavailable ... inexistant ... take your pick ...
If it were an available node. even in its down-status, the guy would not
need to access Fido via a BBS in Z3.
Even his NC/RC is unable to reach him ...
Enjoy the week-end,
I'm sorry if this offended you in any way.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,038 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 148:22:07 |
Calls: | 500,200 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 95,197 |
D/L today: |
419 files (86,933K bytes) |
Messages: | 465,993 |