Can anyone reccomend a good tic processor for linux that isn't htick.
I have tried to get tinytic to work properly, and I really wish I
could, but there seems to be two problems with it. First, if the tic isn't in uppercase then it won't see it and second, if the tic is in uppercase then it will say that it can't find the tinytic cfg.
Anyone know if tinytic is still being supported?
The ticer built into MBSE BBS works like a charm.. :)
Sean Dennis is still active in fidonet. He was one of the developers of tinytic IIRC. I'd ask him in netmail, or I think he can be found in BBS_CARNIVAL.
Can anyone reccomend a good tic processor for linux that isn't htick.
Wht issues are you having with htick Frank?
Wht issues are you having with htick Frank?
Well, I have htick running on my mail hub without a problem, my bbs machine is a whole different story.
everytime I try to toss a tic this is what I get ....
File: size: 0 area:nodediff from 0:0/0 orig: 0:0/0
Link for Tic from Address '0:0/0' not found
Funny thing is that the config looks perfect, yet it doesn't want to
toss the tic.
Have you actually looked inside the problematic TIC file?
The ticer built into MBSE BBS works like a charm.. :)
Can the ticer in MBSE be used by it's self as I am not using MBSE as
my BBS software
Sean Dennis is still active in fidonet. He was one of the developers
of tinytic IIRC. I'd ask him in netmail, or I think he can be found
in BBS_CARNIVAL.
I'll try to track him down to see if he has any ideas.
I think htick is your solution if you can figure out what is happening. I used htick with sbbs at one time with good results.
The ticer built into MBSE BBS works like a charm.. :)
Can the ticer in MBSE be used by it's self as I am not using MBSE as
my BBS software
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,067 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 03:22:24 |
Calls: | 501,266 |
Calls today: | 13 |
Files: | 109,409 |
D/L today: |
12,815 files (9,028M bytes) |
Messages: | 302,253 |
Posted today: | 10 |