• MORON!

    From Ralph M. Smole II to All on Thursday, November 19, 2009 14:50:31
    Dirty Sanchez needs to grow up,get a life and then DIE!
    If you want different menus, CODE YOUR OWN!
    Stupid ass.

    www.freewebs.com/ralphsmole
    bullishmcgee@gmail.com

  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12 to Ralph M. Smole II on Thursday, November 19, 2009 23:33:24

    RMSI> Dirty Sanchez needs to grow up,get a life and then DIE!
    RMSI> If you want different menus, CODE YOUR OWN!

    this doesn't belong in here, does it??

    RMSI> Stupid ass.

    umm... yeah...

    )\/(ark


    * Origin: (1:3634/12)
  • From Joe Davis@1:396/45 to Ralph M. Smole II on Friday, November 20, 2009 08:53:46
    RMSI> Dirty Sanchez needs to grow up,get a life and then DIE!
    RMSI> If you want different menus, CODE YOUR OWN!
    RMSI> Stupid ***.

    RMSI> www.freewebs.com/ralphsmole
    RMSI> bullishmcgee@gmail.com

    RMSI> --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
    RMSI> * Origin: Vertrauen - vert.synchro.net (1:103/705)
    RMSI> SEEN-BY: 31999/98 99
    RMSI> PATH: 103/705 10/1 261/38 396/45


    This appears to have been meant for some other area.

    In the future, please be sure of such, and refrain from allowing posts like this into this area.

    Thanks

    -+- QuikEdit 2.41R+

    --- Maximus/2 3.01
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Meridian, MS-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Richard Webb@1:116/901 to mark lewis on Friday, November 20, 2009 15:09:51
    HI Marc,

    On Thu 2037-Nov-19 23:33, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to Ralph M. Smole II:

    RMSI> Dirty Sanchez needs to grow up,get a life and then DIE!
    RMSI> If you want different menus, CODE YOUR OWN!

    this doesn't belong in here, does it??

    NOpe, it sure doesn't, hence netmail to appropriate parties
    which I"m sure you saw. Suggested right off that he go
    upstream from the system hosting the moron who posted that
    and institute a feed cut. IT's time, past time in fact.
    SInce MR. Swindell won't control access to inappropriate
    echomail conferences by his users its time to cut Mr.
    Swindell's feed to this echo.

    ONe thing I always liked with Maximus, control of access to
    echomail conferences and file areas is quite easy. Even if
    the twit has a priv level which would normally grant access
    the judicious use of keys can prevent it.


    Regards,
    Richard
    --- timEd 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Radio REscue net operations BBS (1:116/901)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to Richard Webb on Saturday, November 21, 2009 08:05:50

    <On 20Nov2009 15:09 Richard Webb (1:116/901) wrote a message to
    mark lewis regarding MORON! >

    HI Marc,

    On Thu 2037-Nov-19 23:33, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to
    Ralph M. Smole II:

    RMSI> Dirty Sanchez needs [SNIP!]

    this doesn't belong in here, does it??

    NOpe, it sure doesn't, hence netmail to appropriate parties
    which I"m sure you saw.
    [SNIP]

    You replied back to MarK with a K Lewis, not to me, MarC with a
    C. So MarK with a K would not have seen the cc of the netmail
    you sent me.

    Best regards,
    Marc

    ... Ninety-five percent of the lawyers give the other five percent a bad name. --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Meridian, MS-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Richard Webb@1:116/901 to Marc Lewis on Saturday, November 21, 2009 22:26:04
    hI Marc,

    NOpe, it sure doesn't, hence netmail to appropriate parties
    which I"m sure you saw.
    [SNIP]

    You replied back to MarK with a K Lewis, not to me, MarC with a C.
    So MarK with a K would not have seen the cc of the netmail you sent
    me.

    Best regards,
    Marc

    <oops> WAsn't paying attention.



    Regards,
    Richard
    --- timEd 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Radio REscue net operations BBS (1:116/901)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12 to Marc Lewis on Sunday, November 22, 2009 14:05:28

    RMSI> Dirty Sanchez needs [SNIP!]

    this doesn't belong in here, does it??

    NOpe, it sure doesn't, hence netmail to appropriate parties
    which I"m sure you saw.
    MarcL> [SNIP]

    MarcL> You replied back to MarK with a K Lewis, not to me, MarC
    MarcL> with a C. So MarK with a K would not have seen the cc of
    MarcL> the netmail you sent me.

    hehe, i was wondering what i missed or possibly got lost... but, maybe he was speaking of me possibly having read it during passthru?? i dunno but i do take measures to not have that much opportunity for such...

    )\/(ark


    * Origin: (1:3634/12)
  • From Richard Webb@1:116/901 to mark lewis on Sunday, November 22, 2009 20:34:40
    HI Marc, and Mark <grin>.
    On Sun 2037-Nov-22 14:05, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to Marc Lewis:

    NOpe, it sure doesn't, hence netmail to appropriate parties
    which I"m sure you saw.
    <snippety doo>
    hehe, i was wondering what i missed or possibly got lost... but,
    maybe he was speaking of me possibly having read it during
    passthru?? i dunno but i do take measures to not have that much
    opportunity for such...

    AS do I. DIdn't look with speech cursor at spelling, and
    Marc is pronounced like Marc by it of course. <dammit>
    Just thought since Marc is active here and has been involved in some recent threads this echo assumed it was him, not you <grin>. <gotta pay attention to the spelling with you
    guys>.

    YOur sig should have told me though Mark, don't think I read that far before hitting the reply button.

    Sorry for the confusion everybody, back to our regularly
    scheduled program.

    Regards,
    Richard
    --- timEd 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Radio REscue net operations BBS (1:116/901)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12 to Richard Webb on Sunday, November 22, 2009 19:31:18

    YOur sig should have told me though Mark, don't think I read that
    far before hitting the reply button.

    one of the reasons why i manually always correct the quote prefixes whan any "ml" or "ML" type quotes are in play :P

    Sorry for the confusion everybody, back to our regularly
    scheduled program.

    not a problem :)

    )\/(ark


    * Origin: (1:3634/12)