Now, I'm dedicated to once again recreate real Hi-Fi, meaning playing
true loss-less (unlike the compressed MP3-files) music. So I started
with my nine CD collection of ABBA music, and re-ripped them all to lossless FLAC files. But before I go all-in on a costly path, I want
to make sure I'm on the right path.
So, I've tried various ways to reproduce the music, and I'm still not totally convinced. There's a long chain of possible POF on the way so
far. The first one is the digital distribution of the music files. And here's where I wonder if there's still some true audiophiles out
there. With the ultimate sound system, and the ear to notice the difference between "normal" music and proper Hi-Fi ditto.
On http://eljaco.se/ABBA/ I have all the 133 ABBA songs in my
possession in a loss-less format.
Can you please check and see if you think it's worth spending
thousands of dollars pursuing this quest.
==================================================================<** Original area : "/FIDO/FN_SYSOP"
..but somewhere on the way, I still feel we lost
something. The perfect sound.
..So I started with my nine CD collection of ABBA music,
and re-ripped them all to lossless FLAC files. But before
I go all-in on a costly path, I want to make sure I'm on
the right path.
So, I've tried various ways to reproduce the music, and^^^
I'm still not totally convinced. There's a long chain of
possible POF on the way so far.
The first one is the digital distribution of the music
files. And here's where I wonder if there's still some
true audiophiles out there. With the ultimate sound
system, and the ear to notice the difference between
"normal" music and proper Hi-Fi ditto.
On http://eljaco.se/ABBA/ I have all the 133 ABBA songs
in my possession in a loss-less format. Can you please
check and see if you think it's worth spending
thousands of dollars pursuing this quest.
..There's a long chain of possible POF on the way
^^^
[?]
Points Of Failure
FLAC also has various levels of compression too. Maybe
you could adjust that to get closer to the non-
discernable difference that you seek.
Flac is a lossless encoder, so the compression level
doesn't matter for the audio quality. It just influences
how much cpu cycles are spent on encoding and decoding
and the resulting file size.
BTW, my PC's can't seem to play FLAC files directly (via VLC
player) The playback stops/stalls every few seconds. But if I
convert to AppleLossless, the playback is much better (iTunes).
* Originally in AUDIO
* Crossposted in FN_SYSOP
* Crossposted in MUSIC
Apparently your hardware isn't fast enough to decode it
on the fly? A bit strange, but I don't know what kind of
hardware you're using. ;-) Maybe it's encoded with the
maximum compression level, which is too much for your
hardware?
Is it one of the files from Bjorn? I could try to re-
encode it with a lower flac compression level. If you're
interested in a test?
Apparently your hardware isn't fast enough to decode it
on the fly? A bit strange, but I don't know what kind of
hardware you're using. ;-) Maybe it's encoded with the
maximum compression level, which is too much for your
hardware?
FLAC files are choppy with the T60/XP
Intel Core Duo T2400
Code Name Yonah
Package Socket 479 mPGA
Technology 65nm
Specification Genuine Intel CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
Rated Bus Speed 665.1 MHz
Stock Core Speed 1833 MHz
Stock Bus Speed 166 MHz
Average Temperature 54 øC
L1 Data Cache Size 2 x 32 KBytes
L1 Instructions Cache Size 2 x 32 KBytes
L2 Unified Cache Size 2048 KBytes
And they're also choppy on my Lenovo 3000 G430. That one is at
a remote site, so I can't confirm specific specs for it right
now.
* Originally in AUDIO
* Crossposted in MUSIC
* Crossposted in FN_SYSOP
FLAC files are choppy with the T60/XP
Intel Core Duo T2400
Code Name Yonah
Specification Genuine Intel CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
So not a real speed monster even when it was introduced
in 2009... ;)
And they're also choppy on my Lenovo 3000 G430. That one
is at a remote site, so I can't confirm specific specs
for it right now.
I think it's about the same generation as the T60, but it
came with different processors. But apparently you don't
have a speedy one...
And regarding another comment, my FLAC files should be totally uncompressed. That was the whole idea behind going from MP3 to FLAC...
Apparently your hardware isn't fast enough to decode it on the fly?
Actually it may be one of the POFs I was talking about? I'm still at IIS
5 and I've got reports that sometimes downloading with http is really slow,
considering that I sit on a 100/100M fiber.
And regarding another comment, my FLAC files should be totally uncompressed. That was the whole idea behind going from MP3 to FLAC...
I only mentioned it because it too operates XP, and seems perfectly
fine with AppleLossless versions.
For Bj”rn's test, I'll be generating CDs from the FLAC files to
test on my hi-fi system.
I had a family friend do a similar test on some of the FLAC vs AppleLossess files that I produced, against the original CD
versions of a few tunes. The fellow has a fine hifi system.
He found no discernable differences.
Actually it may be one of the POFs I was talking about?
I'm still at IIS 5 and I've got reports that sometimes
downloading with http is really slow, considering that
I sit on a 100/100M fiber.
And regarding another comment, my FLAC files should be
totally uncompressed. That was the whole idea behind
going from MP3 to FLAC...
I only mentioned it because it too operates XP, and seems
perfectly fine with AppleLossless versions.
I don't know about AppleLossLess, and how it compares to
Flac.
..The fellow has a fine hifi system. He found no
discernable differences.
There shouldn't be any difference. They all produce the
same bytes that go into your DA converter for playback.
* Originally in FN_SYSOP
* Crossposted in AUDIO
* Crossposted in MUSIC
Hi Bj�rn,
On 2022-01-01 03:11:44, you wrote to All:
[Disclaimer: I don't consider myself an audiophile ;)]
Well, since they are digital copies there is not much more you can do here. Just make sure the cd's are clean before you start ripping, so the chance of uncorrectable reading bit errors is minimal...
It would be nice if they were grouped on an album basis! ;)
What could improve playback experience a bit is if you apply "replaygain" to your files. This doesn't change the bytes that represents the music, but adds some calculated values for the music that can improve your playback experience:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReplayGain
With commandline flac you just add --replaygain when encoding the files. Or you can have it added afterwards if your software doesn't support it directly.
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
I have some ABBA material on CD too. I could compare
some of those and your tunes with my modest system.
I haven't bought a CD in ... pfftttt ... 15 years. I only
got vinyl.
What make/model of record player do you have?
Dual 1242 in the living room. Garrard D-20 in my bedroom. My daughter
has a Gemini manual direct-drive in her room.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,037 |
Nodes: | 17 (2 / 15) |
Uptime: | 20:07:40 |
Calls: | 503,782 |
Calls today: | 11 |
Files: | 158,084 |
U/L today: |
2 files (7K bytes) |
D/L today: |
3,516 files (463M bytes) |
Messages: | 444,277 |
Posted today: | 6 |