I noticed in the whats.new that there was some work done regarding
failure to clean up those .bsy files - looks like in my case, things
were made worse :( I am on linux, 64 bit, debian 9. Thanks for all the hard work!
I noticed in the whats.new that there was some work done regarding
failure to clean up those .bsy files - looks like in my case, things were made worse :( I am on linux, 64 bit, debian 9. Thanks for all the hard work!
There was a typo in a file extension, but that change was made weeks ago and has been tested on FSX hub which is stupid active, so this probably isn't a general issue that everyone is seeing. This means questions!
How are you running fidopoll and mutil? Are you doing it manually or with events or crontab? Who owns the busy files? Who owns fidopoll, mutil, etc? Do you use the MIS BINKP server or just fidopoll?
Hey g00r00, thanks for the reply :)
On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 9:45:09 AM UTC-8, Paul Hayton wrote:
On 12/14/17, Ryan Fantus pondered and said...
Hey g00r00, thanks for the reply :)
alt.bbs.mysticHi Ryan.
Good to see you guys have connected, looks like via Fidonet <>
from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the bit about mis2 being deprecated :)Usenet group :)
g00r00 I queried the ownership stuff as well.
Ryan - what version of A37 are you running? MIS2 was depreciated and became MIS so I wonder if that's the issue?
Best, Paul
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which I upgraded
On 12/14/17, Ryan Fantus pondered and said...
Hey g00r00, thanks for the reply :)
Hi Ryan.
Good to see you guys have connected, looks like via Fidonet <> alt.bbs.mystic Usenet group :)
g00r00 I queried the ownership stuff as well.
Ryan - what version of A37 are you running? MIS2 was depreciated and became MIS so I wonder if that's the issue?
Best, Paul
Quick follow-up - no dice, using mis instead of mis2 results in the sameproblems.
./semaphore/mis2.bsy
- I'm using mis2, but I'm using that as my binkp server.
I also notice my dos doors have stopped working. So, I decided to go for
a fresh install. Dos doors are still broken. Working on message nets shortly :(
Ryan Fantus wrote to Paul Hayton <=-
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the bit
about mis2 being deprecated :)
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which
I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the
bit about mis2 being deprecated :)
Sounds like the reply I was going to give :) So are we not to use
mis2 anymore?
again. That said, I'm using mis2, with a36, as it includes an ssh server...is this unsupported?
DOSEMU was not complaining about security, in fact none of the
complaints were related to security or ownership. DOSEMU complained
about not being able to figure out character sets (cp437, auto, us, etc)
again. That said, I'm using mis2, with a36, as it includes an ssh
server...is this unsupported?
Well you can do whatever you want :)
But I can't support a mix and match of old versions of Mystic that may or may not be compatible with each other, have known issues, etc. A36 doesn't even have a MIS2 so I don't know what you're actually using lol.to
I get that you also need a working BBS too, so I understand why you're back
the old version. But I can't address or help or resolve anything if I don't have the person who has the problem around to help me. I can't send you anew
binary with a fix if you're not at the current release level, etc.
DOSEMU was not complaining about security, in fact none of the complaints were related to security or ownership. DOSEMU complained about not being able to figure out character sets (cp437, auto, us, etc)
I'm not super familiar with DOSEMU but if the error is that it can't read its configuration to get the default character set, then I would think that could be very possibly be related to security.
Most earlier copies of test-release MIS2 (before it had all of the servers fully functional) had an issue where in some cases it wasn't dropping itsroot
access after port binding...then
If you happen to build and test your BBS with that server exclusively, and
switch to the "stable" version which doesn't have that issue, I think itwould
cause all sorts of random shit to go wrong.
As far as the BSY files, the FSXNET hub gets hammered and really tests this stuff hard. There are times when all 16 incoming BINKP nodes are active at once receiving mail while there is also outbound BINKP and echomail tossingall
happening in harmony...deleted,
My point is that if it was a general issue like BSY files not getting
then the entire network would halt within minutes of deploying the server.Thee
would also be a LOT of people reporting the same issue, and so far its only you.
The only other commonality between being unable to delete a BSY file and a piece of software not reading its configuration values in my mind, would be something with security either on the admin side or the software side.
I wasn't saying that to be flippant. A bog standard 112a36 64 bit linux package installed both mis and mis2, and I was using mis2 because it included ssh. I had no idea that it was unsupported. Standard mis looks like the old mystic server.
I can try to repro, I guess. It may be a minimal cost for me to rent additional server space temporarily while we figure this out. I'll mull that over tonight and more than likely will just pull the trigger on getting another box.
I could've sworn the fsx hubs were Windows machines, but I could be
wrong. Like I said, I'll try to repro, something got into a funky state and I'm not sure why. *shrug*
Ben Ritchey wrote to Warp 4 <=-
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which
I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the
bit about mis2 being deprecated :)
Sounds like the reply I was going to give :) So are we not to use
mis2 anymore?
MIS2 was deprecated as of v1.12 A36. Use MIS ONLY after installing A36
:) The updated MIS.Exe in A36 is a renamed version of MIS2.Exe and operates the same.
./semaphore/mis2.bsy
- I'm using mis2, but I'm using that as my binkp server.
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which
I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the
bit about mis2 being deprecated :)
Sounds like the reply I was going to give :) So are we not to use
mis2 anymore?
again. That said, I'm using mis2, with a36, as it includes an ssh server...is this unsupported?
DOSEMU was not complaining about security, in fact none of the
complaints were related to security or ownership. DOSEMU complained
about not being able to figure out character sets (cp437, auto, us, etc)
I wasn't saying that to be flippant. A bog standard 112a36 64 bit linux package installed both mis and mis2, and I was using mis2 because it included ssh. I had no idea that it was unsupported. Standard mis looks like the old mystic server.
I can try to repro, I guess. It may be a minimal cost for me to rent additional server space temporarily while we figure this out. I'll mull that over tonight and more than likely will just pull the trigger on getting another box.
I could've sworn the fsx hubs were Windows machines, but I could be
wrong. Like I said, I'll try to repro, something got into a funky state and I'm not sure why. *shrug*
I also notice my dos doors have stopped working. So, I decided to go for
a fresh install. Dos doors are still broken. Working on message nets shortly :(
Ryan Fantus wrote to Paul Hayton <=-
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the bit
about mis2 being deprecated :)
Ben Ritchey wrote to Warp 4 <=-
Hm, interesting. I'll give mis a shot. I'm running 1.12a37, which
I upgraded from 1.12a36 (which was a fresh install). I missed the
bit about mis2 being deprecated :)
Sounds like the reply I was going to give :) So are we not to use
mis2 anymore?
MIS2 was deprecated as of v1.12 A36. Use MIS ONLY after installing A36
:) The updated MIS.Exe in A36 is a renamed version of MIS2.Exe and operates the same.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,037 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 03:27:29 |
Calls: | 849 |
Calls today: | 17 |
Files: | 95,177 |
D/L today: |
1,938 files (242M bytes) |
Messages: | 464,869 |