Shouldn't Mystic be looking for the basename of the entered File Name
when trying to locate the extracted file for download?
Shouldn't Mystic be looking for the basename of the entered File Name when trying to locate the extracted file for download?
It absolutely should, good call! I have changed it to strip the path after it does the extract during the ASCII view Download in the next build!
Shouldn't Mystic be looking for the basename of the entered File Name when trying to locate the extracted file for download?
It absolutely should, good call! I have changed it to strip the path after it does the extract during the ASCII view Download in the next build!
You probably know this already :), but the latest prealpha (which is a couple of days old now) appears to disallow anything with a path (slash) in it at the archive (V)iewer (D)ownload File Name prompt, i.e. it does not even call the archiver (e.g. tar) if you enter a path as part of the filename.
I redid all of that stuff in the next build I just haven't had time to work on anything since and I haven't released it yet.
I redid all of that stuff in the next build I just haven't had time t work on anything since and I haven't released it yet.
Thank you, g00r00 -- sounds great. You're the best! :)
I can confirm that (D)ownload of a file from a subdirectory inside a tar file from the "external" archive (V)iewer indeed works as intended now with the latest build.
The %2 file name is passed correctly to the archiver (tar), and the resulting extracted file (which I make sure tar junks the path for when extracting) is correctly found by its basename, and sent.
Thanks a lot for fixing this!
Only the "illegal filename" prompt left of all this archiver stuff, then -- then hopefully the archiver section of Mystic will live happily ever after. :)
Only the "illegal filename" prompt left of all this archiver stuff, t
I'll get that in for you today!
Thanks a lot! I'll try to install the latest one shortly.Only the "illegal filename" prompt left of all this archiver stuI'll get that in for you today!
Oh, I forgot to ask, will the length of archiver command lines possibly
be extended in the future, or should I perhaps create a tar wrapper to stuff in all extra (and unfortunately long) flags for tar?
I can extend them in the future but for now they're stuck at 80
characters so you might have to make a .sh file if you need them to be longer.
I've already done the data revisions for A47 so it will have to come in A48 if I extend the length.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,035 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 00:08:29 |
Calls: | 662 |
Calls today: | 10 |
Files: | 95,162 |
D/L today: |
1,526 files (175M bytes) |
Messages: | 299,133 |
Posted today: | 7 |