Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on my floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on
my floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become.
:)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on my floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on my
floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on my
floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
Not anymore, but I have fond memories of OS/2. I was
looking at the ecs website not long ago wondering if I
should do the deal. It's not inexpensive and you have
to also pay more for each core.
Not useless at all, always was and still is good for
FTN stuff. I can do all the FTN stuff on my linux box
that I ever did on OS/2, but I have lost the ease of
running dos doors that I had with OS/2.
Yea, if money was no object, it would be interesting. Makes one wonderI dunno, I wonder if their customer base is commercial. That price may not be so steep for them. If I could get a copy of OS/2 for about the same price as windows I would probably do it.
why it's so expensive...
True enought. DOS/Win support have been the strong as well as the weak point of OS/2. And I believe that if IBM had released 2.0 with the UI of 1.3 instead of delaying it to get the WPS ready, things might have been different.
different. Windows 3.0 would may have been seen as a cheap OS/2
knockoff, who knows? Timing is everything and MS did beat IBM.
It's all so easy in hindsight, isn'it? :)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?I have eComStaion 2.2 in a virtual system using Parallels Desktop for Mac. I run Winblows for the two games I play and it does a decent job of it I might add :). Way back when I used OS/2 Warp 4 (Merlin as it was codenamed) for my BBS'ing when I was in my mid-20's... now when I look in the mirror I see a scruffy, well seasoned face staring back at me ;)
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a Pentium, on my floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
Out of curiosity, anyone still using OS/2 for... anything?
This BBS runs the DOS version of Maximus on OS/2, on a
Pentium, on my floor. I still like the OS, as useless
as it might have become. :)
I was the key part to the creation of 'private' telephone numbers
for FidoNet as I was the creator of the original underground
telephone lines that might survive the Russian whop on the US back
in the days of the Cold War.
Wow! 15 years ago my BBS was running maximus/2, too.
my original frontdoor/fastecho/remoteaccess multinode
system is one of the jobs that my main server has...
along with apache, ftpserv, weasel for web, ftp and
email... there's also binkd, a jamnntpd server and at
least 10 AI controllers for my tradewars 2000 v3 gold
games ;)
as for "useless" that depends on what one wants or
needs to do... as a multitasking OS it works very well
for native OS/2 apps and DOS apps... browsing the
internet and stuff like that? i'd rather use another
system simply because of the possible dangers one might
run into... i'd rather reload a workstation than a
server, ya know? ;)
Yes, I use OS/2 for the bulk of my Fidonnet
operations. Have been doing
so for over 25 years.
Not anymore, but I have fond memories of OS/2. I was looking at the
ecs website not long ago wondering if I should do the deal. It's not
inexpensive and you have to also pay more for each core.
Yea, if money was no object, it would be interesting. Makes one wonder
why it's so expensive...
Not useless at all, always was and still is good for FTN stuff. I can
do all the FTN stuff on my linux box that I ever did on OS/2, but I
have lost the ease of running dos doors that I had with OS/2.
True enought. DOS/Win support have been the strong as well as the weak point of OS/2. And I believe that if IBM had released 2.0 with the UI
of 1.3 instead of delaying it to get the WPS ready, things might have
been different. Windows 3.0 would may have been seen as a cheap OS/2 knockoff, who knows? Timing is everything and MS did beat IBM.
It's all so easy in hindsight, isn'it? :)
why it's so expensive...
I dunno, I wonder if their customer base is commercial.
The first and only version of OS/2 I used was Warp 3 I
up a sealed box somewhere for $20 when I was in some store so someone else could go shopping. I think that's the best deal I ever got. I ran that version happily for years.
the time.. :) Marketing. The Windows marketing crew
must be the best in the
world. I don't know how they did it but they did. If IBM had of stayed the course I likely would have to but maybe there just wasn't enough in it for them to continue.
Way back when I used OS/2 Warp 4 (Merlin as it
was codenamed) for my
BBS'ing when I was in my mid-20's... now when I look in the mirror I see a scruffy, well seasoned face staring back at me ;)
Absolutely still solid with OS/2 here. Have been part of a major group design operation still solidly based on OS/2 since even
[...]
the heavans and do what I think is the real purpose of
all humanity,
Yes, I use OS/2 for the bulk of my Fidonnet
operations. Have been doing
so for over 25 years.
In a VM now or still on it's own physical machine?
why it's so expensive...
ummm... antiques are expensive... rare items are expensive...
m$ beat IBM because IBM didn't know how to support all
the millions of little people... IBM's base was in big
iron and the $$$$$ they could charge for support...
Concord BBS native OS/2 version since the very first alpha, 1994.
floor. I still like the OS, as useless as it might have become. :)
OS/2 is not useless. It just runs, no need to update every day.
my original frontdoor/fastecho/remoteaccess multinode
system is one of the jobs that my main server has...
along with apache, ftpserv, weasel for web, ftp and
email... there's also binkd, a jamnntpd server and at
least 10 AI controllers for my tradewars 2000 v3 gold
games ;)
Quite impressive, I wish I had the will to put up and maintain such a system.
as for "useless" that depends on what one wants or
needs to do... as a multitasking OS it works very well
for native OS/2 apps and DOS apps... browsing the
I always had. :)
internet and stuff like that? i'd rather use another
system simply because of the possible dangers one might
run into... i'd rather reload a workstation than a
server, ya know? ;)
Wise enought, yes. :)
Concord BBS native OS/2 version since the very first alpha, 1994.
Never heard/read about that software. Too late now to switch <BG>.
OS/2 is not useless. It just runs, no need to update every day.
Well said Tommi!
Funny how things change. Back then, I was figuring I'd be running aSame here.. I don't have my OS/2 Warp copy anymore, but I have eComStation 2.2 which does the trick just nicely when I want to look at some OS/2 stuff.. fortunately I've managed to track down this offline reader setup for the Mac :)
custom PC with some flavor of Linux by now. Instead, I'm sporting a Macintosh with some flavor of UNIX. :)
Never heard/read about that software. Too late now to switch <BG>.
Oh my.. Concord was written by a finn Pasi Talliniemi. I was in the
beta team from the beginning. I may be the last person to run it..
Concord is somewhat a successor for SuperBBS by Aki Antman. When Aki stopped the development of SuperBBS 1993, Pasi decided to write a
bbs software of his own. The last version of Concord was released
31.12.99.
Hello, Mike Luther.
On 30.07.15 8:02 you wrote:
I was the key part to the creation of 'private' telephone numbers
for FidoNet as I was the creator of the original underground
telephone lines that might survive the Russian whop on the US back
in the days of the Cold War.
Mua-ha-ha, now we've got your name. :)
Hello, Mike Luther.
On 30.07.15 8:02 you wrote:
I was the key part to the creation of 'private' telephone numbers
for FidoNet as I was the creator of the original underground
telephone lines that might survive the Russian whop on the US back
in the days of the Cold War.
Mua-ha-ha, now we've got your name. :)
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,041 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 09:19:47 |
Calls: | 501,711 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 104,421 |
D/L today: |
792 files (776M bytes) |
Messages: | 298,359 |
Posted today: | 2 |