I think there is a port of VirtualBox for OS/2 now, or at least it is being worked on.
I've heard rumors of people getting W10 to run under VPC/2 but I
can't substantiate that.
Why this talk about Virtual OS/2?
I think there is a port of VirtualBox for OS/2 now, or at least it is
being worked on.
I've heard rumors of people getting W10 to run under VPC/2 but I
can't substantiate that.
Why this talk about Virtual OS/2?
So OS/2 suits itself to being run under a VM nicely if the VM can
handle OS/2's usage of esoteric API calls when it boots up.
do you know if it can be run on a QEMU-KVM VM?
i might have just popped on a way to move my system from hardware to
VM if it will run under QEMU-KVM... i have been rsyncing it to my main linux system... if i install OS/2 into a QEMU-KVM VM and get my rsync
also installed, then i should be able to simply rsync everything out
of the backup and reboot and be off to the races... it all depends on
if i can get it installed in a VM... no clue how to do that using the HOST's floppy drive and/or CD... maybe making images and tying them
into the VM is the way to go??
What I normally do is I use Warp 4.52 (bootable CD) and mount it into
the blank VM's CD drive. Usually it works just fine.
Why this talk about Virtual OS/2?
Because OS/2 won't install on a 6TB SAS disk correctly.
Also because OS/2 has a serious issue installing on modern hardware.
So OS/2 suits itself to being run under a VM nicely if the VM can
handle OS/2's usage of esoteric API calls when it boots up.
Why this talk about Virtual OS/2?
because sometimes you have to run OS/2 on hardware that is too
new...
because sometimes you have to reduce your hardware count and still
need to run OS/2...
because sometimes you cannot be playing games rebooting and
switching OSes all the time...
i tried bootmanager one time and the only thing i found it good for
was being able to boot to a maint install...
Who needs a 6 TB disk?
Probably your BBS may use such capacity, but not normal humans.
You don't have to tell me that. Only single core CPU's and small partitions are accepted at install.
I have been told that the new versions such as Arca-OS and eComOS can
be installed on modern machines.
i did that and had to dance around a bit to figure out how to allocate some drive space in that damned LVM thing... once i got that going on
because sometimes you cannot be playing games rebooting and switching
OSes all the time...
I don't have time nor the inclination to run games.
i tried bootmanager one time and the only thing i found it good for
was being able to boot to a maint install...
This machine always starts up with the BM but if I don't decide to
boot to another operating system within xx seconds it autoboots to
OS/2.
i did that and had to dance around a bit to figure out how to
allocate some drive space in that damned LVM thing... once i got that
going on
I had no problems at all...it was just like running real
hardware...that's really strange!
Those of us who like to use modern hardware. You'd be surprised at
how quickly you can fill up disks when you're a file hub.
I have been told that the new versions such as Arca-OS and eComOS can
be installed on modern machines.
There's a limit to how modern, however. That's why I moved my BBS
to Linux.
Something fun: someone has written a 16-bit OS/2 shell for Linux. :)
i wasn't speaking of games like solitare or minecraft... i was
sppeaking of playing games by rebooting to go from one OS to
another...
This machine always starts up with the BM but if I don't decide to
boot to another operating system within xx seconds it autoboots to
OS/2.
i was poking at dual-booting with a sharp stick again ;)
i wasn't speaking of games like solitare or minecraft... i was
sppeaking of playing games by rebooting to go from one OS to
another...
Maybe that can be called a game too. ;o)
Speaking of Solitaire, that is the only game I allowed Windows10 to install two years ago. So far, I haven't played that on those
machines.
This machine always starts up with the BM but if I don't decide to
boot to another operating system within xx seconds it autoboots to
OS/2.
i was poking at dual-booting with a sharp stick again ;)
To each his own, I like it <BG>.
Speaking of Solitaire, that is the only game I allowed Windows10 to install two years ago. So far, I haven't played that on those
the new solitare is ok... it is slightly better than previous ones...
i was poking at dual-booting with a sharp stick again ;)
the main reason i don't like it (dual booting) is because that other
OS is not busy doing something worth while... if i have to have two
or more OSes installed, they're all going to be running and
most of them are running in virtual machines... i cannot say that the
I find no need for a 16-bit system. I don't even have so old hardware, except the museum pieces Sinclair ZX-81 and a Triumph-Adler CP/M
machine
You do realize that OS/2's stock command shell is 16-bit and not
32-bit, right?
In a message on 06-11-18 Sean Dennis said to Robert Wolfe:
Hi Sean,
I think there is a port of VirtualBox for OS/2 now, or at least it is
being worked on.
I've heard rumors of people getting W10 to run under VPC/2 but I
can't substantiate that.
Why this talk about Virtual OS/2?
When you install OS/2 you get a very nice BootManager that lets you
decide which operating system to use, OS/2, Windows or old PCDOS
and even Linux.
When you install OS/2 you get a very nice BootManager that lets you
decide which operating system to use, OS/2, Windows or old PCDOS
and even Linux.
Yeah, but for some, the method you are talking about may not be an
option, as is the case with me. Some of us like to be able to use
Windows and OS/2 (or ArcaOS as is my case) at the same time without
having to flip-flop back and forth between OSes by rebooting. To
me, what it boils down to is a matter of convenience, and,
sometimes, necessity.
Because OS/2 won't install on a 6TB SAS disk correctly.
Who needs a 6 TB disk?
Probably your BBS may use such capacity, but not normal humans.
Also because OS/2 has a serious issue installing on modern hardware.
You don't have to tell me that. Only single core CPU's and small partitions are accepted at install.
So OS/2 suits itself to being run under a VM nicely if the VM can
handle OS/2's usage of esoteric API calls when it boots up.
I have been told that the new versions such as Arca-OS and eComOS
can be installed on modern machines.
Yeah, but for some, the method you are talking about may not be an
option, as is the case with me. Some of us like to be able to use
Windows and OS/2 (or ArcaOS as is my case) at the same time without
having to flip-flop back and forth between OSes by rebooting. To
me, what it boils down to is a matter of convenience, and,
sometimes, necessity.
Thank you for your opinion, I can see the point.
As long as I can do what I need to in OS/2, I'm happy to use only
that.
BTW, is the BootManager still with ArcaOS?
Actually, I use multiple _8TB_ disks daily here at home, but not for
BBS use. So, what is a "normal" human by definition?
You don't have to tell me that. Only single core CPU's and small partitions are accepted at install.
From my experiences, that is not the case with eCS and ArcaOS.
I have been told that the new versions such as Arca-OS and eComOS
can be installed on modern machines.
True, but with varying degrees of success, but it's still best to
run both under a VM if you need your main OS to be Windows or Linux
based.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,041 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 09:10:04 |
Calls: | 501,711 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 104,421 |
D/L today: |
685 files (771M bytes) |
Messages: | 298,358 |
Posted today: | 2 |