1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. POLITICS

  • Protecting Kids on Social

    From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Friday, August 02, 2024 07:23:25
    Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

    "just as long as they're at least 13 years old." They're doing it under the guise of "protecting children" when in reality it actually puts children at greater risk of being molested by leftists.

    So business as usual. Elitist policies ALWAYS have the opposite impact of what they claim.


    ... Do witches use Spell-checkers?
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Friday, August 02, 2024 09:57:18
    "just as long as they're at least 13 years old." They're doing it und the guise of "protecting children" when in reality it actually puts children at greater risk of being molested by leftists.

    So business as usual. Elitist policies ALWAYS have the opposite impact
    of what they claim.

    It's always either the opposite, or it's something contrary to what the sheeple think it is. Facebook and Twitter are both guilty of it, despite how "rightist" Elon Musk pretends to be.

    They've been inviting children to network with strange adults all this time, and now they seem to have convinced Democrats to reaffirm their sick agenda with legislation.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)