$7.99 for an 11oz bag of chips seems strange.
$7.99 for an 11oz bag of chips seems strange.
What seems strange is that you even buy that junk food then, while going on about food prices going up (while they actually are going down).
Is Harris forcing you to buy it? How much nutritious groceries would that buy you?
Which foods are going down in price? I buy bread, milk, eggs, bacon, cereal, chicken, and fish. The bread that I buy has gone up 50% from $1 to $1.49. There's no good reason for it either. Bread was $1 when Obama was president and it was $1 when Trump was president. Why does Kamala Harris make us pay 50% more for our bread after she spent $891 billion dollars on her "Inflatio
Ask any American is $7.99 for a bag of Lays chips is a reasonable price! Americans used to eat chips because we used to be able to afford them.
Why does Kamala Harris make us pay
50% more for our bread after she spent $891 billion dollars on her "Inflation Reduction Act?"
I definitely don't see groceries going down in price.
Ask any American is $7.99 for a bag of Lays chips is a reasonable price Americans used to eat chips because we used to be able to afford them.
I can't say as I agree with your politics, but I certainly agree with this. I definitely don't see groceries going down in price. I go to
the store and come home with $200 some bucks of groceries and it's only like three bags. It's pathetic.
Why does Kamala Harris make us pay
50% more for our bread after she spent $891 billion dollars on her "Inflation Reduction Act?"
The factual errors (borderline lies) are so grave and many,
especially in this one sentence, I'll not even try to correct you.
You really need to take your Harris-Walz vaccine against the MAGA
virus soon, or your brain damage will become beyond repair.
(Sorry I was such a big liar by calling it a 50% increase!)
Anyhow, do you really think sky-rocketing food prices are a US-only problem in a world with global inflation? And that your president or
even vice president is causing it?
Whatever. But would you, consequently, vote for someone who can
impose a federal ban on price-gauging for groceries (which is the
leading cause)?
Whatever. But would you, consequently, vote for someone who can
impose a federal ban on price-gauging for groceries (which is the
leading cause)?
Price-fixing is akin to socialism and we are a capitalist state. The farmers have to pay more for oil, gas, bovine veterinarian care,
property tax, so they have to charge more for their products. Price
fixing isn't going to help farmers achieve their dream of owning an underground mansion in Hawaii.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Björn Felten <=-
Deficit spending causes inflation, and Kamala Harris spent $891 billion dollars under the guise of "reducing inflation." So she HAS contributed
to the problem, although she is not the root cause.
Price-fixing is akin to socialism and we are a capitalist state. The farmers have to pay more for oil, gas, bovine veterinarian care,
property tax, so they have to charge more for their products. Price
fixing isn't going to help farmers achieve their dream of owning an underground mansion in Hawaii.
Whatever. But would you, consequently, vote for someone who can
impose a federal ban on price-gauging for groceries (which is the
leading cause)?
Price-fixing is akin to socialism and we are a capitalist state. The farmers have to pay more for oil, gas, bovine veterinarian care, property tax, so they have to charge more for their products. Price fixing isn't going to help farmers achieve their dream of owning an underground mansion in Hawaii.
A massive pile of word salad, including about half a dozen crazy conspiracy theories, meaning 'NO', right?
Deficit spending causes inflation, and Kamala Harris spent $891 billi dollars under the guise of "reducing inflation." So she HAS contribut to the problem, although she is not the root cause.
Of course not. She's a puppet just like Joe was.
She doesn't have enough brain cells to formulate a policy (unless it was
Price fixing always has the same result: scarcity of the product.
Whether it be housing or food, the outcome is always the same.
So are these people total morons or are they doing it on purpose?
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yea, there's no way that anyone from the Democrat party is allowed to
make their own decisions. Not their presidential nominees anyway. Not anymore.
Do you think Bill Clinton made his own decisions? There was always speculation about it, but he wasn't as obvious of a puppet as the
latter pee-ons.
Do you think Bill Clinton made his own decisions? There was always speculation >about it, but he wasn't as obvious of a puppet as the latter pee-ons.
I definitely don't see groceries going down in price.
I hope that not you, too, are blaming Kamala for this.
I definitely don't see groceries going down in price.
I hope that not you, too, are blaming Kamala for this.
Oh no, I didn't mean it that way. Economics is a huge thing with tons of moving parts. I think people give presidents way too much credit/blame for fluctuations.
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,034 |
| Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 40:19:44 |
| Calls: | 786 |
| Calls today: | 11 |
| Files: | 95,174 |
| U/L today: |
3 files (8K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
10,173 files (511M bytes) |
| Messages: | 299,629 |