Just a restatement of what I had asked in IRC:
10:55 < khelair> msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a preferred method of accessing
what the last_msg or last_read pointer might be for the mail
sub, is it?
11:07 < khelair> would I be correct in assuming that the Mail sub, in the
standard shell, utilizes the applicable message header
attributes to glean where the unread ones are at?
though I misphrased it pretty poorly at the beginning. What I meant to say was 'If msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a potential method of accessing the last_msg or last_read pointers, then would I be correct in assuming that the mail sub, in the standard shell, utilizes applicable message header attributes to clean where the unread ones are at?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,018 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 63:12:06 |
Calls: | 503,153 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 225,127 |
D/L today: |
7,717 files (7,406M bytes) |
Messages: | 440,432 |
Posted today: | 3 |