• Flashterm Socket Server (repost)

    From Fishy to All on Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:06:34
    I just hacked together a Flash Socket Policy server in .js
    and upped it at bbs.defcon.no and vert

    The "protocol" so so darned simple, the file is to be considered
    public domain.

    (Posting this via vert, because I am unable to set the BBS tagline
    on Defcon BBS because of segfault on Enter.. Need to recompile some day ;)

    -- Fishy -- SysOp at Defcon BBS -- telnet://bbs.defcon.no
    (Reposted after fail-post in Dove conf #9)
  • From Tracker1@TRN to Fishy on Thursday, October 01, 2009 20:24:50
    On 9/30/2009 12:06 PM, Fishy wrote:
    I just hacked together a Flash Socket Policy server in .js
    and upped it at bbs.defcon.no and vert

    The "protocol" so so darned simple, the file is to be considered
    public domain.

    (Posting this via vert, because I am unable to set the BBS tagline
    on Defcon BBS because of segfault on Enter.. Need to recompile some day ;)

    here's mine from a couple weeks ago... http://bbsing.info/downloads/socket-policy-service.zip

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/

    ... The key to immortality is first living a life worth remembering.

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roughneck BBS - telnet://roughneckbbs.com - www.roughneckbbs.com
  • From Fishy to Tracker1 on Saturday, October 03, 2009 04:15:38
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Tracker1 to Fishy on Thu Oct 01 2009 08:24 pm

    I just hacked together a Flash Socket Policy server in .js
    and upped it at bbs.defcon.no and vert

    here's mine from a couple weeks ago... http://bbsing.info/downloads/socket-policy-service.zip

    So, after a bunch of people asking for an integrated solution for a while
    and nobody posing code, all of a sudden we have two working implements ;)

    Just a Q. Why do you keep the XML as an actual file? Seeing as the only
    things that need to be changed in the XML is allow-access-from
    domain and to-ports, I personally thought it cleaner to keep the XML
    inline in the JS, and not adding a possible local security hole...

    -- Fishy -- Defcon BBS -- telnet://bbs.defcon.no
  • From Jas Hud@jashuddovenet@nospameob-bbs.com to Fishy on Sunday, October 04, 2009 21:32:49
    Fishy wrote:
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Tracker1 to Fishy on Thu Oct 01 2009 08:24 pm

    I just hacked together a Flash Socket Policy server in .js
    and upped it at bbs.defcon.no and vert

    here's mine from a couple weeks ago... http://bbsing.info/downloads/socket-policy-service.zip

    So, after a bunch of people asking for an integrated solution for a while
    and nobody posing code, all of a sudden we have two working implements ;)



    python and php one works fine too.
  • From Fishy to Jas Hud on Tuesday, October 06, 2009 00:49:25
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Jas Hud to Fishy on Sun Oct 04 2009 09:32 pm

    So, after a bunch of people asking for an integrated solution for a while and nobody posing code, all of a sudden we have two working implements ;)

    python and php one works fine too.

    As a Synchronet integrated service? How?
  • From Tracker1@TRN to Fishy on Wednesday, October 07, 2009 21:25:55
    On 10/6/2009 12:49 AM, Fishy wrote:
    python and php one works fine too.

    As a Synchronet integrated service? How?

    Well, you can actually launch a static executable via the Synchronet services.
    Probably not the best way, but it can be done... I'd stick with a built in .js version myself.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/

    ... FRA #102: Nature decays, but latinum lasts forever.

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roughneck BBS - telnet://roughneckbbs.com - www.roughneckbbs.com
  • From Jas Hud@jashuddovenet@nospameob-bbs.com to Fishy on Thursday, October 08, 2009 00:03:45
    Fishy wrote:
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Jas Hud to Fishy on Sun Oct 04 2009 09:32 pm

    So, after a bunch of people asking for an integrated solution for a while
    and nobody posing code, all of a sudden we have two working implements ;)

    python and php one works fine too.

    As a Synchronet integrated service? How?

    you can launch them from the bbs. i think it's preferable to have
    something separate from the bbs handle this, but to each their own.


    how's this .js effect the bbs users? i know nttp/email/ftp/web really
    causes the users on a system to lag.
  • From Digital Man to Jas Hud on Wednesday, October 07, 2009 22:18:59
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Jas Hud to Fishy on Thu Oct 08 2009 12:03 am

    Fishy wrote:
    Re: Re: Flashterm Socket Server (repost)
    By: Jas Hud to Fishy on Sun Oct 04 2009 09:32 pm

    So, after a bunch of people asking for an integrated solution for a while and nobody posing code, all of a sudden we have two working implements ;)

    python and php one works fine too.

    As a Synchronet integrated service? How?

    you can launch them from the bbs. i think it's preferable to have
    something separate from the bbs handle this, but to each their own.

    I think that's silly.

    how's this .js effect the bbs users? i know nttp/email/ftp/web really
    causes the users on a system to lag.

    Not here. Not at all. The only JS-caused lag I recall hearing about was with Win9x/Me systems.

    digital man

    Snapple "Real Fact" #109:
    Smelling apples and/or bananas can help you loose weight.
  • From Tracker1@TRN to Jas Hud on Thursday, October 08, 2009 07:08:45
    On 10/7/2009 10:03 PM, Jas Hud wrote:
    how's this .js effect the bbs users? i know nttp/email/ftp/web really
    causes the users on a system to lag.

    The entire protocol/script for delivering the small string to the flash client is *VERY* small... even a 1/4 to 1/2 second lag one time is acceptable here.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/

    ... FRA #121: Everything is for sale, even friendship.

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roughneck BBS - telnet://roughneckbbs.com - www.roughneckbbs.com