I think I may have found the answer to the problem, the solution is a different matter which I will leave to the programmers :)
About ten minutes later, I tossed more mail and now a view of my
outbound :
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.Flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
FLO 2:263/93 ------------------------------------ (0107005d.flo)
8K 09.11.03 13:30 # /var/max/spool/outbound/0000035a.su2
Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo, something is happening during the add to existing archive process that
is creating the second flo.
Hello Sean!
09 Nov 03 14:57, you wrote to All:
I think I may have found the answer to the problem, the solution is
a different matter which I will leave to the programmers :)
Let's here it!
About ten minutes later, I tossed more mail and now a view of my
outbound :
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.Flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
FLO 2:263/93 ------------------------------------ (0107005d.flo)
8K 09.11.03 13:30 # /var/max/spool/outbound/0000035a.su2
Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo, something is happening during the add to existing archive process
that is creating the second flo.
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo,
something is happening during the add to existing archive process
that is creating the second flo.
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which it
still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Hello Sean!
10 Nov 03 21:00, you wrote to me:
Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo,
something is happening during the add to existing archive process
that is creating the second flo.
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which it
still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)
Hello Sean!
11 Nov 03 09:03, you wrote to me:
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)
Actually what did you specifically do?
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
Hello Sean!
Nov 13 19:25 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:
Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?
I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
Oh gotta look at that :-)
Okay sounds very nice ;-)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
Oh gotta look at that :-)
LOL :)
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
:)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
Oh gotta look at that :-)
LOL :)
Well I'm seriuos, there might be "Yet another filecase" error..
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
:)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
Oh gotta look at that :-)
LOL :)
Well I'm seriuos, there might be "Yet another filecase" error..
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I think I may have found the answer to the problem, the...
solution is a different matter which I will leave to
the programmers :)
Here is a view of my outbound.
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
1K 09.11.03 14:40 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
About ten minutes later, I tossed more mail and now a...
view of my outbound :
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.Flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to
duial flo/Flo, something is happening during the add to
existing archive process that is creating the second
flo.
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
:)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
Hello Sean!
Nov 16 18:27 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:
Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes
it
:)
Actually what did you specifically do?
I changed :
AddMode
to
;AddMode
...
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Hello Sean!
Nov 19 16:10 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Thanks, did it work out?
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Thanks, did it work out?
Yeah seems to have.
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Thanks, did it work out?
Yeah seems to have.
Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
or do it leave it in outbound.sq?
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Thanks, did it work out?
Yeah seems to have.
Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
or do it leave it in outbound.sq?
Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works
Hello Sean!
23 Nov 03 11:18, you wrote to me:
I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out
I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..
You are the greatest :)
Thanks, did it work out?
Yeah seems to have.
Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
or do it leave it in outbound.sq?
Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works
It's squish i'm talking about, is it creating arcmail boundles fine
with flo files fine?
Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
or do it leave it in outbound.sq?
Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works
It's squish i'm talking about, is it creating arcmail boundles fine
with flo files fine?
Yeah sorry it is working fine but I never reenabled that option :)
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,049 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:06:31 |
Calls: | 235,753 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 60,336 |
D/L today: |
190 files (561M bytes) |
Messages: | 287,499 |
Posted today: | 3 |