• Linux Squish flo and FLO a possible answer

    From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 09:03:52
    Hello Bo,

    On 11/Nov/03 at 00:02 you wrote:

    Hello Sean!

    10 Nov 03 21:00, you wrote to me:

    Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to duial flo/Flo,
    something is happening during the add to existing archive process
    that is creating the second flo.

    Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

    I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which it
    still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)


    Cheers,
    \Sean

    --- MadMED v0.43i/W32 (Mar 10 2000 08:11:02)
    * Origin: TCOB1 a way of life (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 22:26:42
    Hello Sean!

    11 Nov 03 09:03, you wrote to me:

    Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

    I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
    it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7
    * Origin: The Night Express - Roennede, Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Thursday, November 13, 2003 19:25:30
    Hello Bo,

    On 12/Nov/03 at 22:26 you wrote:

    Hello Sean!

    11 Nov 03 09:03, you wrote to me:

    Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

    I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
    it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode




    Cheers,
    \Sean

    --- MadMED v0.43i/W32 (Mar 10 2000 08:11:02)
    * Origin: TCOB1 a way of life (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Friday, November 14, 2003 15:25:56
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 13 19:25 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

    I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
    it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    Oh gotta look at that :-)

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.18-bf2.4 (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Friday, November 14, 2003 17:20:54
    Hello Bo,

    On 14/Nov/03 at 15:25 you wrote:

    Hello Sean!

    Nov 13 19:25 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Do you use some "special" features for 236/150?

    I use no special features, I did turn off the add to batch which
    it still does but no more dual flo/Flo :)

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    Oh gotta look at that :-)

    LOL :)


    Cheers,
    \Sean

    --- MadMED v0.43i/W32 (Mar 10 2000 08:11:02)
    * Origin: TCOB1 a way of life (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Sunday, November 16, 2003 03:21:50
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 14 17:20 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Okay sounds very nice ;-)

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    Oh gotta look at that :-)

    LOL :)

    Well I'm seriuos, there might be "Yet another filecase" error..

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.18-bf2.4 (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Sunday, November 16, 2003 18:27:18
    Hello Bo.

    16 Nov 03 03:21, you wrote to me:

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
    :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    Oh gotta look at that :-)

    LOL :)

    Well I'm seriuos, there might be "Yet another filecase" error..

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    Sean

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: TCOB1 a BBS in Ireland (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 16:36:11
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 16 18:27 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
    :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    Oh gotta look at that :-)

    LOL :)

    Well I'm seriuos, there might be "Yet another filecase" error..

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    Damn I'm getting stress. :/

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.18-586tsc (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Bob Jones@1:343/41 to Sean Rima on Monday, November 17, 2003 16:58:44
    I think I may have found the answer to the problem, the
    solution is a different matter which I will leave to
    the programmers :)

    Here is a view of my outbound.
    FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
    1K 09.11.03 14:40 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
    ...

    About ten minutes later, I tossed more mail and now a
    view of my outbound :

    FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.Flo)
    6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
    FLO 2:236/150 ----------------------------------- (00ec0096.flo)
    6K 09.11.03 14:50 # /var/max/spool/outbound/001b0321.su7
    ...

    Noticed that 236/150 has gone from a single flo to
    duial flo/Flo, something is happening during the add to
    existing archive process that is creating the second
    flo.

    THANKS!

    I am guessing that we have a bug in the rename or copy, append and delete function under Squish in a Unix / Linux environment caused by file name case sensitivity issues.

    Now let's see if we can track down where in the code this bug is biteing. :( The "quick fix" for file name case issues is obviously not handling this instance.

    Take care.....

    Bob Jones, 1:343/41




    --- Maximus/2 3.01
    * Origin: Top Hat 2 BBS (1:343/41)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Wednesday, November 19, 2003 00:06:07
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 16 18:27 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes it
    :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    ...

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.18-586tsc (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Wednesday, November 19, 2003 16:10:40
    Hello Bo.

    19 Nov 03 00:06, you wrote to me:

    Hello Sean!

    Nov 16 18:27 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Maybe there is something in that section of code that causes
    it
    :)

    Actually what did you specifically do?

    I changed :
    AddMode
    to
    ;AddMode

    ...

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Sean

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: TCOB1 a BBS in Ireland (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Friday, November 21, 2003 00:53:52
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 19 16:10 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.18-586tsc (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Friday, November 21, 2003 09:09:51
    Hello Bo.

    21 Nov 03 00:53, you wrote to me:

    Hello Sean!

    Nov 19 16:10 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Yeah seems to have.

    Sean

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: TCOB1 a BBS in Ireland (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Saturday, November 22, 2003 12:42:50
    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Yeah seems to have.

    Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
    or do it leave it in outbound.sq?

    Bo



    --- Maximus/UNIX 3.03b
    * Origin: The Night Express (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Sunday, November 23, 2003 11:18:47
    Hello Bo.

    22 Nov 03 12:42, you wrote to me:

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Yeah seems to have.

    Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
    or do it leave it in outbound.sq?

    Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works


    Sean

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: TCOB1 a BBS in Ireland (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Sunday, November 23, 2003 15:22:35
    Hello Sean!

    23 Nov 03 11:18, you wrote to me:

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Yeah seems to have.

    Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
    or do it leave it in outbound.sq?

    Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works

    It's squish i'm talking about, is it creating arcmail boundles fine with flo files fine?

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7
    * Origin: The Night Express - Roennede, Dk (2:236/100)
  • From Sean Rima@2:263/950 to Bo Simonsen on Sunday, November 23, 2003 16:54:17
    Hello Bo.

    23 Nov 03 15:22, you wrote to me:

    Hello Sean!

    23 Nov 03 11:18, you wrote to me:

    I hope you can, it would be another bug ironed out

    I _might_ have fixed it in the CVS commit, I did just do..

    You are the greatest :)

    Thanks, did it work out?

    Yeah seems to have.

    Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
    or do it leave it in outbound.sq?

    Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works

    It's squish i'm talking about, is it creating arcmail boundles fine
    with flo files fine?

    Yeah sorry it is working fine but I never reenabled that option :)

    Sean

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
    * Origin: TCOB1 a BBS in Ireland (2:263/950)
  • From Bo Simonsen@2:236/100 to Sean Rima on Thursday, November 27, 2003 17:25:47
    Hello Sean!

    Nov 23 16:54 03, Sean Rima wrote to Bo Simonsen:

    Is squish still doing the creation of packages in the outbound
    or do it leave it in outbound.sq?

    Lost me there but I have sqafix doing the autocreate which works

    It's squish i'm talking about, is it creating arcmail boundles fine
    with flo files fine?

    Yeah sorry it is working fine but I never reenabled that option :)

    Okay.

    Regards,
    Bo

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/2.4.22 (i586))
    * Origin: The Night Express, Roennede Dk (2:236/100)