There are fundemental things I doesn't like about MBSE:
1. It's using JAM, anyhow I could live with that.
2. It's using UNIX accounts for users (I can't live with that).
3. It's uses Binary configuration files (I can't live with that).
- Maximus is more smart it's "compiles" a plain ASCII configuration
file and take it from there.
been running Maximus and Squish under MS-Dos since March 1992!Okay. :) It's good and very stable software even on UNIX! :)
I allways wanted to learn Fortran but I'm not studying a place where
they are using that.
There are fundemental things I doesn't like about MBSE:
1. It's using JAM, anyhow I could live with that.
There's not anything wrong with JAM, is there?
2. It's using UNIX accounts for users (I can't live with that).
Why not?
3. It's uses Binary configuration files (I can't live with that).
I agree that that's sometimes a bit annoying. Although one gets more
er less used to it after a while.
- Maximus is more smart it's "compiles" a plain ASCII
configuration file and take it from there.
Oh yes, the famous mecca :) I wonder if mbse couldn't use something
like that as well. I'll ask Michiel...
been running Maximus and Squish under MS-Dos since March 1992!
Okay. :) It's good and very stable software even on UNIX! :)
When I chenged to Linux, it didn't exist yet... And if somebody would
be kind enough to port GIGO [for the Fidonet <-> Internet gating] I
might go back to them.
I allways wanted to learn Fortran but I'm not studying a place
where they are using that.
I don't think that would be very useful. Nobody uses it any more.
The last two years I've not seen one single vacancy that asked for Fortran. Om the other hand: *if* there would be one, the chance that
you would get the job is quite big.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,067 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 15:10:48 |
Calls: | 501,254 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 109,407 |
D/L today: |
3,609 files (8,243M bytes) |
Messages: | 302,074 |
Posted today: | 1 |