How can I get squish to use one of my aka's instead of my main fidonet address when packing mail bundles? I have address lines in my squish.cfg file
but it states that it uses all the address lines after the first as an aka.
When my system packs mail to another network other than fidonet, it always uses my fidonet address on the archived mail bundles instead of the network
address aka for that network. Any ideas come to mind from anyone? I'm useing
version 1.11 of squish on a DOS box. If anyone wants me to post my squish.cfg
to show me where I'm makeing my mistake, just let me know. Thanks in advance
as I'm sure I'll get plenty of replies.
How can I get squish to use one of my aka's instead of my main fidonet address when packing mail bundles? I have address lines in my squish.cfg file but it states that it uses all the address lines after the first as an aka.
When my system packs mail to another network other than fidonet,
it always uses my fidonet address on the archived mail bundles instead
of the network address aka for that network.
I think if you add -p111:111/111 before the node your sending to squish will use that address instead of your main aka for path lines, seen-bys
and packet headers. Replace 111:111/111 with the node number you want
to be used for that area.
When defining an area (netmail or echomail) use -p<aka to use> in the very same line in squish.cfg.
In route.cfg I defined specific routing statements, i.e.:
route normal <file> <zone.net.node.point> <z.n.??? net/hub/node/...>
send direct <file> <zone.net.node.point>
I have something like this in my route.cfg
Send Normal World
Send Direct 92:602/100
Send Direct 510:507/0
etc.
Is this where I'm haveing the problem then?
How can I get squish to use one of my aka's instead of my main fidonet address when packing mail bundles? I have address lines
in my squish.cfg file
but it states that it uses all the address lines after
the first as an aka.
The two "Send Direct" lines should come before the "Send Normal" line. If 92:602/100 and 510:507/0 are the nodes seeing the problem, then this is probably the cause of the issue.
Just a wild guess but in ROUTE.CFG are you routing for these nodes BEFORE y route to WORLD? If you have these out of order then the WORLD address becom the origin for everything that follows that statement.
I think if you add -p111:111/111 before the node your sending to squish
will use that address instead of your main aka for path
lines, seen-bys and packet headers. Replace 111:111/111 with
the node number you want to be used for that area.
I'm already doing that for each of the echos. It puts everything in there like it is suppose to but when it packs it up useing zip etc. it uses my fidonet address on all the archived bundles instead of my aka's.
I'm already doing that for each of the echos. It
puts everything in there
like it is suppose to but when it packs it up
useing zip etc. it uses my
fidonet address on all the archived bundles instead of my aka's.
It's been some time now since I have used squish but I remember
going through this myself. I used a utility by David Nugent, I
forget what it's called now but there are dos and os2 versions of
it,
It's been some time now since I have used squish but I remember
going through this myself. I used a utility by David Nugent, I
forget what it's called now but there are dos and os2 versions of
it,
That would be INSPECTA, and excellent Packet level utillity.
The two "Send Direct" lines should come before the
"Send Normal" line. If
92:602/100 and 510:507/0 are the nodes seeing the
problem, then this is
probably the cause of the issue.
Originally I had the send normal line after the send direct lines. I just changed then before I posted the messages and it didn't
make a difference. I
have many send direct lines in my route.cfg file and
those 2 nodes aren't the
only ones seeing my fidonet address on the archived
packets. I can load up
frontdoor and look at the archived bundles and they all have my fidonet address on them instead of my networks aka.
The two "Send Direct" lines should come before the
"Send Normal" line. If
92:602/100 and 510:507/0 are the nodes seeing the ...
Originally I had the send normal line after the send direct lines. I
I suspect that with Squish being 4D and not 5D aware, along with trying to run a single copy of squish is the problem.
Be ensured: No, it isn't.
Sometimes you just have to stop and give credit where credit is due.
Scott Dudley sure did a good job with Maximus and Squish. I still
marvel at it to this day.. :)
Interesting.... Results from using Inspecta (mentioned in other recent
The only potential glitch with that is that you will need to do some specia zone definitions for all but the main FTN configuration if you are using Binkley Style Outbound areas..... Now, if you aren't using that, then the
Now, if you aren't using that, then the
problem may be one with the interactions between squish and your front end. Since I run Binkley, and I know there is an option for an alternate style, that may be where the problem is....
Everything inside the bundles checked out correctly with the
right node addresses.
I don't use blinkley style outbound at all, not even squish type.
I use normal type outbound
that one would use with frontdoor type mailers.
I don't use a frontend mailer at all. I do all my stuff
through Transx,
I just
have Frontdoor around to use it's Xrobot program for my
InterBBS Global War game.
Do you know if TransX creates the Netmail Message (I have never used TransX I do not know)? if it does then that must be causing the problem somehow...
So it can't be FrontDoor causing the problem then, as it creates the Netmai on the fly...
The only potential glitch with that is that you
will need to do some specia
zone definitions for all but the main FTN
configuration if you are using
Binkley Style Outbound areas..... Now, if you
aren't using that, then the
I don't use blinkley style outbound at all, not even
squish type. I use normal
type outbound that one would use with frontdoor type mailers.
I don't use a frontend mailer at all. I do all my stuff
through Transx, I just
have Frontdoor around to use it's Xrobot program for my
InterBBS Global War
game.
I still think it is something I'm overlooking in my squish setup.
Then what is producing your final mail bundles for sending. If you aren't Binkley Style Outbound, then it should be something other than Squish.
So your archive bundle has your Fidonet address and not the AKA for your othernet. Do the packed messages contain the correct Origin address?
Please post your Squish.Cfg file, because something else is not right somewhere.
I still think it is something I'm overlooking in my squish setup.
So your archive bundle has your Fidonet address and not the AKA for
your othernet. Do the packed messages contain the correct Origin
address?
Please post your Squish.Cfg file, because something else is not right somewhere.
Please post your Squish.Cfg file, because something else is not right somewhere.
Please post your Squish.Cfg file, because something else is not right somewhere.
Here is my squish.cfg file with all the commented lines took out.
Go it thanks. Can you also please post your Route.Cfg file?
Have you inspected the created packets complete with messages? What address shows in the messages? In particular, do the messages appear in a packet wi the correct "othernet" address? What about the addressing on a created pack does it show the correct FROM and TO addressing?
I loaded up inspecta and everything inside the archived
bundle has the correct othernets addresses.
Send Direct NoArc 1:2320/303.99=============================================
Send Direct NoArc 92:606/1
Send Direct NoArc 92:606/2
Send Direct NoArc 7:77/0.2
So this suggests that the messages, packets AND mail bundles (the ZIPed Mai packets) all contain addressing that is correct. If so then I am not sure w your problem is, because in your first message you said -
Whic appears to conflict with the second part above. So where is the RIGHT address being used, and where is the WRONG one being used???
squish only creates mail packets, it does not ZIP them, so the addressing within the packet is used for the AMA transfer.
Ok let me explain it this way.
all the *.pkt files inside the mail bundle has all the
correct addressing. The
mail bundle itself (*.su0 *.mo0 etc.) is useing my
fidonet address instead of
the aka's that are on the *.pkt files. I hope that explains it a little better.
The right address being used are on the *.pkt files,
the wrong address being
used are on the *.su0 *.mo0 etc. files.
Mail packets are zipped if you have zip as your default packer in your compress.cfg that squish uses to archive mail bundles.
One thing I can think of causing this is where you are packing Mail for an other net address, but your system does not have an address within that Othernet for YOUR system. In this case you need to ensure SQUISH.CFG contai and address for YOUR node within that other net, and that then matches up w the NETWORK addressing of a target node.
Are you able to provide some actual examples of file names used for these othernet addresses?
I note that your ROUTE.CFG had NOCOMP for several othernet addresses, what happens to the mail for those addresses, as they should not be compressed..
Are you able to provide some actual examples of
file names used for these othernet addresses?
07120106.th1
073000ca.th0
Your problem is simple, you are confusing Squish because it re-orders the statements in the ROUTER.CFG file due to the FLAVOURS you are mixing togeth
So try ordering your file as follows -
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,063 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 90:48:46 |
Calls: | 501,400 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 109,432 |
D/L today: |
4,250 files (9,950M bytes) |
Messages: | 296,863 |