• No compression to one node

    From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to All on Monday, October 29, 2018 11:19:02
    Hello All.

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?

    Best regards,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Marc Lewis on Monday, October 29, 2018 13:02:34

    On 2018 Oct 29 11:19:02, you wrote to All:

    MarcL> How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular
    MarcL> node?

    i don't know and apparently others also do not... i know that several squish using systems linked here are sending bundles for echomail instead of raw PKTs... some send netmail in a bundle and others have figured out a way to send
    netmail as PKTs...

    )\/(ark

    Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
    Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
    ... How Not To Be Seen, lesson 5. Don't stand up.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From Sean Dennis@1:18/200 to Marc Lewis on Monday, October 29, 2018 14:47:37
    Hello Marc,

    29 Oct 18 11:19 at you wrote to All:

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?

    Let me dig up my Squish config file from backup tonight. Squish does have a way to do this IIRC correctly in the config file and using the ROUTE.CFG file.

    Later,
    Sean

    ... You can lead a man to slaughter, but you can't make him think.
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Limestone, TN, USA (1:18/200)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@2:240/5832 to Marc Lewis on Monday, October 29, 2018 20:25:23
    Hallo Marc!

    29.10.2018 11:19, Marc Lewis schrieb an All:

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?
    Netmail or echomail?

    Best regards,
    Marc
    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX01: up 13d 22h 26m load: 39 proc, 158 threads (tbupv1.0)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5-18
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (2:240/5832)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to Torsten Bamberg on Monday, October 29, 2018 20:04:37
    Hello Torsten.

    <On 29Oct2018 20:25 Torsten Bamberg (2:240/5832) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No compression to one node >


    29.10.2018 11:19, Marc Lewis schrieb an All:

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?
    Netmail or echomail?

    Thank you for your reply!

    He would prefer to receive everything uncompressed, but I'm not sure that Squish can do this.

    Herzliche Grüße,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to mark lewis on Monday, October 29, 2018 19:10:46
    Hello mark.

    <On 29Oct2018 13:02 mark lewis (1:3634/12.73) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No compression to one node >

    MarcL> How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular
    MarcL> node?

    i don't know and apparently others also do not... i know that
    several squish using systems linked here are sending bundles for
    echomail instead of raw PKTs... some send netmail in a bundle and
    others have figured out a way to send netmail as PKTs...

    I'll keep digging to see if I can find something in the docs. Why this particular node prefers to receive data uncompressed is, how shall I say it, unconventional?

    Best regards,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to Sean Dennis on Monday, October 29, 2018 19:14:08
    Hello Sean.

    <On 29Oct2018 14:47 Sean Dennis (1:18/200) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No compression to one node >

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?

    Let me dig up my Squish config file from backup tonight. Squish
    does have a way to do this IIRC correctly in the config file and
    using the ROUTE.CFG file.

    I did a quick scan of the Squish.doc but didn't spot anything yet. :( Hopefully you'll run across something. I've got another issue with packet passwords, but that's going to be another thread...

    Best regards,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12 to Marc Lewis on Tuesday, October 30, 2018 09:47:30
    Re: RE: No compression to one node
    By: Marc Lewis to mark lewis on Mon Oct 29 2018 19:10:46

    markl> i don't know and apparently others also do not... i know that
    markl> several squish using systems linked here are sending bundles for
    markl> echomail instead of raw PKTs... some send netmail in a bundle and
    markl> others have figured out a way to send netmail as PKTs...

    MarcL> I'll keep digging to see if I can find something in the docs. Why
    MarcL> this particular node prefers to receive data uncompressed is, how
    MarcL> shall I say it, unconventional?

    ummm... it is not really unconventional... i've been doing raw PKTs here for years on my old FD/RA/FE system... i'm doing it now with this new synchronet installation... on the old system, one of the initial mail tossing actions was to first extract all the bundles to raw PKTs... that was done via a tool known as SPAZ... the mail tosser never saw any bundles and all of my links were set to no archiver so they got raw PKTs... one or two switched the archiver back to zip and i switched it right back to none... even on a fast machine, the time spent to archive PKTs into mail bundles is just wasted time...

    there really is no reason for archiving PKTs into mail bundles these days... it was done in the past mainly to shorten the connection time since that cost real $$$... in today's world, this isn't a concern... then one can also factor in that the server can compress on the fly during transmission and bundles are just not necessary...


    )\/(ark
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
    * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@2:240/5832 to Marc Lewis on Tuesday, October 30, 2018 18:47:41
    Hallo Marc!

    29.10.2018 20:04, Marc Lewis schrieb an Torsten Bamberg:

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular
    node?
    Netmail or echomail?
    Thank you for your reply!
    You are welcome. :-)

    He would prefer to receive everything uncompressed, but I'm not sure
    that Squish can do this.
    Well, no, squish can't sent echomail uncompressed by default.
    But, if you define a different squish.cfg witout any packer defintions, all pakets will be uncompressed.

    If you want to sent netmail without compression, do a 'squish out' without 'squash'.

    Compressing mail was one of the main features of squish.

    Possibly hpt/fastecho can handle uncompressed mail, but I really don't know this, because im not using one of them.

    Herzliche Grüße,
    Marc
    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX01: up 14d 23h 07m load: 38 proc, 157 threads (tbupv1.0)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5-18
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (2:240/5832)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to Torsten Bamberg on Tuesday, October 30, 2018 19:08:31
    Hello Torsten.

    <On 30Oct2018 18:47 Torsten Bamberg (2:240/5832) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No compression to one node >

    He would prefer to receive everything uncompressed, but I'm not sure
    that Squish can do this.
    Well, no, squish can't sent echomail uncompressed by default. But,
    if you define a different squish.cfg witout any packer defintions,
    all pakets will be uncompressed.

    After reading throught the documentation, this is the same conclusion I came to. But switching back and forth for one Node would be, at best, impractical.

    If you want to sent netmail without compression, do a 'squish out'
    without 'squash'.

    Yes, and the same is true for an EchoMail outbound scan, but the outbound directory would become a nightmare. It's a Binkley style outbound and Binkley doesn't recognise uncompressed packets IIRC; Internet Rex does, but tends to miss some from time-to-time.

    Compressing mail was one of the main features of squish.

    Indeed. It was, if I'm not mistaken, one of the first tossers that did it automatically, first to the FidoNet ARC standard, then expanding out to handle multiple archivers/unarchivers.

    MarK Lewis pointed out that now-a-days it hardly makes sense to waste compute cycles to archive outbound packets due to the connectivity via the internet now
    commonly utilised; but still, there are traditional Binkley based mailers that require compressed mail bundles with their attendant .?LO files. I still have users that come in over POTS line and get their mail and others that telnet into the system to Binkley and pick up mail that way. I'm just going to leave everything alone... It's been working for the last 25 years with few major failures. :-)

    Possibly hpt/fastecho can handle uncompressed mail, but I really
    don't know this, because im not using one of them.

    Every one that I can think of does so, in fact, I believe it's an FTS requirement.

    Best regards - Herzliche Grüße,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Rob Swindell to Marc Lewis on Wednesday, October 31, 2018 04:33:17
    Re: Re: No compression to one node
    By: Marc Lewis to Torsten Bamberg on Tue Oct 30 2018 07:08 pm

    If you want to sent netmail without compression, do a 'squish out' without 'squash'.

    Yes, and the same is true for an EchoMail outbound scan, but the outbound directory would become a nightmare. It's a Binkley style outbound and Binkley doesn't recognise uncompressed packets IIRC;

    BSO recognizes/supports uncompressed packets (e.g. outbound/*.out) just fine.

    MarK Lewis pointed out that now-a-days it hardly makes sense to waste compute cycles to archive outbound packets due to the connectivity via the internet now
    commonly utilised; but still, there are traditional Binkley based mailers that require compressed mail bundles with their attendant .?LO files.

    That would weird considering the original Binkley mailer (BinkleyTerm) did not (require compressed mail bundles).

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #83:
    Donations to the Synchronet project are welcome @ http://wiki.synchro.net/donate
    Norco, CA WX: 68.9°F, 16.0% humidity, 5 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
  • From Fred Riccio@1:132/174 to Marc Lewis on Wednesday, October 31, 2018 08:45:16
    Hello Marc!

    29 Oct 18 11:19, Marc Lewis wrote to All:

    How do I set Squish to not compress packets for one particular node?


    This works for me...

    ----- Route.Cfg begins -----
    Send Crash NoArc 2:302/0 ; Bjorn doesn't like compressed mail bundles
    ----- Route.Cfg ends -----

    --- Msged/NT 6.0.1
    * Origin: Somewhere in New Hampshire's White Mountains (1:132/174)
  • From Marc Lewis@1:396/45 to Fred Riccio on Wednesday, October 31, 2018 12:54:11
    Hello Fred.

    <On 31Oct2018 08:45 Fred Riccio (1:132/174) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No compression to one node >

    This works for me...

    ----- Route.Cfg begins -----
    Send Crash NoArc 2:302/0 ; Bjorn doesn't like compressed mail
    bundles ----- Route.Cfg ends -----

    Excellent! I'll give that a try! Many thanks.

    Best regards,
    Marc

    --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)
  • From Sean Dennis@1:18/200 to Fred Riccio on Wednesday, October 31, 2018 14:04:16
    Hello Fred,

    31 Oct 18 08:45 at you wrote to Marc Lewis:

    ----- Route.Cfg begins -----
    Send Crash NoArc 2:302/0 ; Bjorn doesn't like compressed mail bundles
    ----- Route.Cfg ends -----

    That was it, Fred! I knew it was in ROUTE.CFG but I couldn't remember the keyword.

    Later,
    Sean

    ... Celibacy is NOT hereditary.
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Limestone, TN, USA (1:18/200)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@2:240/5832 to Fred Riccio on Thursday, November 01, 2018 01:21:47
    Hallo Fred!

    31.10.2018 08:45, Fred Riccio schrieb an Marc Lewis:

    ----- Route.Cfg begins -----
    Send Crash NoArc 2:302/0 ; Bjorn doesn't like compressed mail bundles
    ----- Route.Cfg ends -----
    okay. I haven't found this defintions for the route.cfg of squish.

    Thanks a lot.

    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX01: up 16d 5h 05m load: 36 proc, 155 threads (tbupv1.0)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5-18
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (2:240/5832)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Marc Lewis on Friday, November 02, 2018 21:02:30

    On 2018 Oct 30 19:08:30, you wrote to Torsten Bamberg:

    MarcL> MarK Lewis pointed out that now-a-days it hardly makes sense to
    MarcL> waste compute cycles to archive outbound packets due to the
    MarcL> connectivity via the internet now commonly utilised; but still,

    :thumbs up:

    MarcL> there are traditional Binkley based mailers that require compressed
    MarcL> mail bundles with their attendant .?LO files.

    actually, not required... BSO doesn't care... as far as the ?LO files go, they can point to any file to be delivered... it is up to the mail tosser to determine what and how it presents to the mailer via the BSO...

    MarcL> I still have users that come in over POTS line and get their mail
    MarcL> and others that telnet into the system to Binkley and pick up mail
    MarcL> that way. I'm just going to leave everything alone... It's been
    MarcL> working for the last 25 years with few major failures. :-)

    that works, too :)

    Possibly hpt/fastecho can handle uncompressed mail, but I really
    don't know this, because im not using one of them.

    MarcL> Every one that I can think of does so, in fact, I believe it's an
    MarcL> FTS requirement.

    hunh? links??

    )\/(ark

    Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
    Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
    ... My modem isn't slow, it's "baudly" challenged.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From Sean Dennis@1:18/200 to Torsten Bamberg on Thursday, November 01, 2018 16:24:05
    Hello Torsten,

    01 Nov 18 01:21 at you wrote to Fred Riccio:

    okay. I haven't found this defintions for the route.cfg of squish.

    It's in the Squish manual (starting at page 74 under "Send"):

    The optional NoArc modifier stops Squish from archiving the packet that is created for the specified system. Squish will simply change all normal-flavoured packets to the
    specified flavour, placing all of the original packets into one large packet file. The command "Send NoArc" has the same net effect as "Change Normal". This modifier apples to BinkleyTerm systems only.

    ...

    In the BinkleyTerm outbound area, using Send (without the NoArc modifier) has the following result:

    xxxxyyyy.OUT --> xxxxyyyy.MO? + xxxxyyyy.?LO

    With the NoArc modifier, the result will be as follows:

    xxxxyyyy.OUT --> xxxxyyyy.?UT

    Later,
    Sean

    ... I'm in a phone booth at the corner of Walk and Don't Walk.
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Limestone, TN, USA (1:18/200)